Browse
Search
Minutes 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Minutes 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 3:28:11 PM
Creation date
9/9/2022 3:25:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 12-1 - Information Item - May 24, 2022 BOCC Meeting Follow-up Actions List
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 12-2 - Information Item - Tax Collector’s Report - Numerical Analysis
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 12-3 - Information Item - Tax Collector’s Report - Measure of Enforced Collections
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 12-4 - Information Item - Tax Assessor's Report - Releases Refunds under $100
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 12-5 - Information Item - Memorandum - 2022-27 Master Aging Plan (MAP)
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 4-a - Process for Realignment of Regional Workforce Development Boards
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 4-b - Voluntary Agricultural District Designation – Multiple Farms
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 5-a - Second Public Hearing and Proposed Orange County FY 2022-2023 HOME Annual Action Plan and Activities
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 6-a - Longtime Homeowner Assistance (LHA) Additional Information
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 6-b - Manufactured Homes Action Plan
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 8-a - Minutes
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 8-b - Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 8-c - Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 8-d - Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Amendment #12
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 8-e - Renewal of Health Services Agreement with Southern Health Partners for Medical Services at the Orange County Detention Center
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 8-f - Table Application for Future Land Use Map and Zoning Atlas Amendment – Richardson (MA20-0006) – NC Highway 86 South, Near Fletcher Road
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda - 06-07-2022; 8-g - Orange County ABC Board Travel Policy
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
Agenda for June 7, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 06-07-2022 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
35 <br /> Commissioner Richards noted that the 10-to-5-year homeownership requirement really <br /> increases the impact. She said that this is estimated at 100% usage and even 25% would be a <br /> huge increase to last year. <br /> Commissioner Fowler asked what portion of the bill this would cover. <br /> Corey Root said all these scenarios cover the Orange County portion. <br /> Commissioner Fowler asked if this means that people in the 31%-60% and 60%-80% <br /> would not get assistance. <br /> Corey Root said using these averages but that this is the highest income estimated and <br /> each situation would be calculated individually. <br /> Commissioner Bedford asked for information on how the multiplying factor of .67 is <br /> derived. <br /> Commissioner Hamilton thanked Corey Root and Nancy Freeman for their work on this <br /> presentation. She asked if previous data reflects the incomes of the recipients. <br /> Corey Root said it was calculated and she can provide that. <br /> Commissioner Hamilton asked if it covered all income levels <br /> Corey Root said yes, up to 80%, and all the other levels were covered. <br /> Chair Price asked if it is sustainable to change the distribution guidelines year by year as <br /> opposed to having a fixed formula. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said that is currently how the county handles the grants for the <br /> small business and ag grants and this is modeled after those as far as prioritization. <br /> Chair Price said she felt concerned when looking at property taxes versus a grant but if <br /> it is ok by statute, she is fine. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br /> George Barrett said they are working with a much smaller sample set of people. He said <br /> that the multiplying factor of .67 helps them distribute the funds evenly while representing the <br /> full formula. He said they knew they had $40,000 and they experimented with factors and .67 <br /> made sense. He said that not every formula is perfect, so the multiplying factor to aid the <br /> person's tax burden can be adjusted. He thanked the Board and staff for all their work on <br /> figuring out this program. He said there has been a big arch from where it started. He asked the <br /> Board to pass the second year of the LHA program. He said the program should focus on tax <br /> burden and should qualify people who have lived in their home for 5 years. He said it should <br /> focus on those under 80% AMI. He said that everyone who applies and qualifies should receive <br /> some assistance. He said that no person should spend more than 2% of their income on <br /> property taxes so that would mean that those applying that are over 80% AMI should still <br /> receive some assistance if they qualify based on their income to tax bill ratios. <br /> Matthew Fearrington said he has been in his house for over 20 years and his uncle <br /> before him. He said that he has never seen a tax assessor at the house, so he has no idea how <br /> the tax is assessed. He said if someone did come by, he would have told them that he lives in a <br /> flood zone and homes flood often. He said if the tax assessor would come to his house, he <br /> would show them the damage. He said the house is not worth what it is assessed at because of <br /> the structure even though it looks nice on the outside. <br /> Heather Ferrell said she grew up in northern Orange County and now lives in Northside. <br /> She said she is here with her neighbors tonight. She said that the residents in the Northside <br /> district are living treasures and are up against forces of gentrification. She said that there is not <br /> a lot that can be done about it, but the LHA program is something that can be done. She <br /> thanked Nancy Freeman and Corey Root for their work on this program. She asked the Board <br /> to approve eligibility at 80% AMI, occupancy at 5 years, and to address the whole tax burden <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.