8.3.22 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 9.7.22 392 Perdita Holtz: I don't know Tony,full disclosure to everybody, I live within the 1,000 foot notification boundary and I don't 393 remember this parcel ever being up for rezoning. 394 395 Delores Bailey: What would keep Bravos from being able to expand? 396 397 Pat Mallett: Septic 398 399 Delores Bailey: Would that not be the same problem for whatever structure they decide to put here? 400 401 Cy Stober: They would size the septic for the structure at that time. As part of the new structure the septic tank would be 402 placed in the ground at the same time the foundation is being laid.Any expansion of Bravos or Fiesta Grill would require 403 replacing the existing septic tank with a larger one. 404 405 Beth Bronson: Based on the details of the rezoning requests, it would seem that construction wants to go for the whole 406 parcel, right? Not piecemeal from what is zoned for LC-1 and NC-2? The intention is to develop the entire 4.8 acres? 407 408 Ross Godwin: That is correct, obviously we would be abiding by the County UDO. 409 410 David Blankfard: If we approve this zoning change,that takes away the ability to further develop the rest of the intersection, is 411 that correct. 412 413 Adam Beeman: There would be 1.3 acres left for someone. 414 415 David Blankfard: So if we do not approve it the community could have 4 parcels that could be built instead of just 1, 416 hypothetically? 417 418 Adam Beeman: It's been available for a long time,that node has been there for a while. 419 420 David Blankfard: I'm saying you could have 1 now or 4 in the future. 421 422 Statler Gilfillen: I am hearing a number of things, I'd like to compliment the number of people that have shown up and spoken 423 and the politeness. What this Board will do we'll vote on something that will affect their personal lives. I will assume that any 424 final approval we give, if we are pro, has to be based on the ability of the owner to do a worst case scenario,the maximum. 425 That is a potential. We approve it and they could tell us they are going to put a 3,000 sq.ft. building plus parking but once the 426 approval is in they can do what they want under the law. I have not heard from the people asking for the rezoning, any 427 justification supporting a specific local need of a corporate store versus all the small local businesses that are going in. It 428 raises the question that if this a potential or corporate store,what will be developed could be out of context and out of scale to 429 what is there and seems to be servicing the local community. 430 431 Charity Kirk: On a similar vein, I also feel that the potential size is out of character in the neighborhood both away from Hwy 432 54 and just the large parcel compared to the other parcels so I want that to be taken into consideration whether it's a dollar 433 store or something else. The potential for being out of character with the neighbor needs. 434 435 David Blankfard: I don't think we know what the setbacks are, I think the square footage that we have right now is based on 436 zero setbacks and zero buffers. 437 438 Charity Kirk: Even a 10,000 sq.ft. building is a bit out of character for this area and what would be allowed considering how 439 deep that parcel is—just my comment. 440 441 David Blankfard: Setbacks,sewer system,well, buffers and all of that,there is a reason why most of the properties out there 442 are 2,000 sq.ft. again this is probably going to be around 2,000 sq.ft. once the civil people get in there and figure it out. 443 444 Statler Gilfillen: If we were to approve this what is the maximum that could go in, I've not heard that information so it leaves 445 me questioning will this or will this not be under the context of the community. Could we be doing harm to the community. 446 447 David Blankfard: That is something that the applicant should present at the County Commissioner's meeting.