Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-2022; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
Agenda - 09-06-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-06-2022; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2022 3:31:22 PM
Creation date
9/1/2022 3:09:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for September 6, 2022 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2022\Agenda - 09-06-2022 Business Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
310
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> 1 broader than just $500,000. She said that even if she agreed that schools are in crisis, she said <br /> 2 they has to be very careful about where they take it from. She said that she did not agree that <br /> 3 this was a fiscally sound decision. <br /> 4 Chair Price said they have a responsibility to the people who have worked for the <br /> 5 county. She said she wants to avoid setting the county up for a bad reputation on how they <br /> 6 manage their finances. She said that she would prefer to find the funds elsewhere. She said <br /> 7 she does not feel that taking from one to give to another. <br /> 8 Commissioner Fowler said she was a very conservative person, and originally had <br /> 9 concerns about the proposed amendment. She agreed that the schools are in crisis and lacking <br /> 10 a teacher is a crisis. She suggested taking only $250,000 for the schools and leaving $250,000 <br /> 11 for the OPEB Trust Fund. <br /> 12 Commissioner Bedford said she would accept that amendment. <br /> 13 Chair Price asked the County Manager if ARPA funds could be used for a teacher <br /> 14 retention program. <br /> 15 Gary Donaldson said under revenue replacement there is some cushion, and it could be <br /> 16 done. <br /> 17 Bonnie Hammersley said she thought it was an eligible use. She said when the county <br /> 18 gives ARPA funds to other entities, the county signs an agreement with the entity that they will <br /> 19 do all of the reporting. She said the county does not budget funds for the schools by line item, <br /> 20 and that the county cannot tell the school districts how to use the funds. <br /> 21 Commissioner Bedford asked if ARPA funds could be used to supplant SRO or nurse <br /> 22 funds for school resource officers and other positions and then use the funds for the schools. <br /> 23 Bonnie Hammersley said she did not think it would be an eligible use because those <br /> 24 positions did not come up as a need during the COVID-19 pandemic. She said the county <br /> 25 cannot supplant ongoing expenses with ARPA. <br /> 26 Chair Price asked if it were a teacher retention program would it work. <br /> 27 Bonnie Hammersley said that salaries would be a current expense and she did not think <br /> 28 that would be an eligible use. She said that she would be very cautious about that. She said that <br /> 29 she does not want to get into a mess in 2024 over ARPA funding and management. <br /> 30 Commissioner Hamilton said that Gary Donaldson's report made it clear that there is no <br /> 31 threat to their bond rating. <br /> 32 Gary Donaldson said it has not been a concern at the rating agencies. He said the other <br /> 33 part of that is that jurisdictions are beginning to do a multi-tiered approach and prefunding an <br /> 34 irrevocable trust. He said that is the reason for a slow and incremental approach. He said the <br /> 35 actuary may show a higher rate of return when they do their report. <br /> 36 Commissioner Hamilton said right now it will not affect our bond rating. <br /> 37 Commissioner Richards said she did not read it that way. <br /> 38 Commissioner Hamilton said it is something in the future that might affect the bond <br /> 39 rating. She said that it is not something we need to be concerned about now. <br /> 40 Commissioner Richards said that this could create a bigger gap to fill in the future and <br /> 41 that will have to be addressed. She said that anything they do for the schools this year will be <br /> 42 part of their budget in future years and will continue. She said by adding additional funds they <br /> 43 would be creating a situation where there will be less to put into the fund in the future. She said <br /> 44 that schools would start out in a higher place than where they are now. <br /> 45 Commissioner McKee said it is easy to create funding for worthy projects. He said that <br /> 46 they create precedents and expectations. He said they create programs that take on a life of its <br /> 47 own. He said that they have set the precedent of not funding OPEB and allowing the liability to <br /> 48 grow from $60 million to $160 million in 10 years. He said that he does not think that the <br /> 49 additional funding of $500,000 will affect the schools. He said they have the #1 and #3 school <br /> 50 systems in the state. He said that they cannot let the legislature dump it back on counties <br /> 51 because it creates a bleed down problem and he is not willing to let Orange County pick up the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.