Browse
Search
9.7.22 Planning Board Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
9.7.22 Planning Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2022 3:47:00 PM
Creation date
8/31/2022 3:41:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/7/2022
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
9.7.22 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 168 Ross Godwin: A portion of that site is zoned commercial and we are looking to rezone the rest of the parcel to commercial for <br /> 169 a general retail store. <br /> 170 <br /> 171 Sue Hunter: Is there any other information you can provide? <br /> 172 <br /> 173 Ross Godwin: Not at this time. <br /> 174 <br /> 175 Melissa Poole: So they already own this property and part of it is zoned commercial and you are saying that the typical space <br /> 176 is 10,000 sq.ft. as an average, do you have a building plan already and can you give us a more definitive building size that is <br /> 177 going to go here? Is it going to sprawl or is it going to be multiple stories? <br /> 178 <br /> 179 Ross Godwin: No,just one story and typically that average is about 10,000 sq.ft. <br /> 180 <br /> 181 Randy Marshall: I believe that really goes beyond the scope of what we are trying to . . . . <br /> 182 <br /> 183 Melissa Poole: I know, just for my sake, I wanted to know. <br /> 184 <br /> 185 Randy Marshall: To some extent those questions are unfair of the developer because they are not required to give that <br /> 186 information and it makes it appear that they are hiding something if they don't provide that information. But it's not required <br /> 187 information that we need to take into account to approve or not approve the rezoning. <br /> 188 <br /> 189 Statler Gilfillen: I differ with what you said. We are rezoning something for which they could put, regardless what they put on <br /> 190 there,there is a maximum size. They may say 10,000 now but it goes through the approval process, maybe it's going to be <br /> 191 20,000, maybe it's going to be a 30,000 sq.ft. building. I have to look at what is the maximum use of this property if we grant <br /> 192 them the rezoning. That I think is fair within our purview to look at. I am not disagreeing with you on principles like what are <br /> 193 you going to do now unless they want to tell us. Do they have an actual contract with the company if this succeeds? Which if <br /> 194 I'm hearing right,you don't right now. You have an interest but not a formal agreement with somebody, right? <br /> 195 <br /> 196 Ross Godwin: Correct. <br /> 197 <br /> 198 Statler Gilfillen: I think we need to consider that if this gets approved,what could they put on that property that maxes it out <br /> 199 which may or may not impact the neighbors that live there. <br /> 200 <br /> 201 Charity Kirk: What are the sizes of the stores in the area? How much parking do they have? Is the potential of merging all <br /> 202 the lot going to allow for a building that doesn't match the character in the area.Allowing a large building on a single property. <br /> 203 What is the square footage of the buildings in the area? <br /> 204 <br /> 205 Overlapping conversations <br /> 206 <br /> 207 Charity Kirk: Based on reading the emails, people are pretty sure what is going to go in there and I think more of a concern is <br /> 208 the character changing in the area. <br /> 209 <br /> 210 Staff reviewed on-line tax assessor information and determined that some of the commercial building sizes in the area were: <br /> 211 7,066;4,280;8,800;2,700; 1,680 square feet. <br /> 212 <br /> 213 Charity Kirk: So 10,000 is large for the area but not out of character. The question for me and the neighbors is a very large <br /> 214 building or a larger building does not fit the character that they are looking for. If we allow this lot to be developed it would <br /> 215 max out the all of the LC-1 and NC-2 for that area rather than having separate small businesses. Is that what we want or is <br /> 216 that what the neighborhood wants. There is talk about the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan so it's coming <br /> 217 down to the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan is it to just continue to push development of any kind? <br /> 218 <br /> 219 Cy Stober: No, in fact mitigating sprawl is an objective of the Comprehensive Plan and in general promoting consistent <br /> 220 character is also a thread throughout that Plan. However, in the Rural Commercial Activity Nodes,there is no distinction <br /> 221 between types of commercial or intensity of commercial. It simply is to encourage commercial in these areas of up to a certain <br /> 222 threshold so that is the basis for the staff finding. <br /> 223 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.