Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
7 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 57 be restored,the Chair will recess the meeting until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge <br /> 58 is observed. <br /> 59 <br /> 60 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS <br /> 61 Chair Beeman reviewed the rules for the public and noted the 3 minute limit policy to address the Planning Board <br /> 62 <br /> 63 AGENDA ITEM 7: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT(CONVENTIONAL DISTRICT) —To review and make a recommendation to the <br /> 64 BOCC on an applicant-initiated zoning atlas amendment to rezone a 3.67 acres of a 4.83 acre parcel from <br /> 65 AR(Agricultural Residential)to NC-2(Neighborhood Commercial) (1.19 acres)and LC-1 (Local <br /> 66 Commercial) (2.48 acres). <br /> 67 The parcel's address is 3026 White Cross Road in the Bingham Township(PIN 9749-40-2351). This item is <br /> 68 scheduled for the BOCC public hearing on September 6, 2022. <br /> 69 PRESENTER: Brian Collie, Planner II <br /> 70 <br /> 71 Brian Collie presented a PowerPoint presentation and reviewed the proposed zoning atlas amendment. The applicant's <br /> 72 representative did not have a presentation. <br /> 73 <br /> 74 Steve Kaufmann: There seems to be a lot of overlap of allowed uses between the two zones here. <br /> 75 <br /> 76 Clarification was made that there was no current overlap in the NC-2 and AR zones which is why the request is to change all <br /> 77 the AR zone to commercial with a mix of NC-2 and LC-1 <br /> 78 <br /> 79 David Blankfard: Where is the physical structure going to be located on the property? <br /> 80 <br /> 81 Brian Colllie: That is not part of what is before the Planning Board,this is simply for the rezoning process. <br /> 82 <br /> 83 David Blankfard: Can we put conditions on the approval? <br /> 84 <br /> 85 Adam Beeman: No, if approved it would come back. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 Perdita Holtz: The site plan review would be a staff review. <br /> 88 <br /> 89 David Blankfard: How much of property could they build upon if rezoned? What I'm getting at is, is there is going to be a <br /> 90 building there, how many parking spaces and I would like for the building to be in the original NC-2, and put the parking in the <br /> 91 LC-1. Switch what is in AR now to parking. <br /> 92 <br /> 93 Pat Mallett: AR doesn't allow for parking as a principal use so that wouldn't be an option. <br /> 94 <br /> 95 David Blankfard: Once we change it, it's open season,they can do whatever they want for parking and building. <br /> 96 <br /> 97 Statler Gilfillen: If this is approved,what is the maximum size structure they can put on this site and what would be the <br /> 98 parking spaces. <br /> 99 <br /> 100 Perdita Holtz: I have done a quick calculation based on floor area ratio for NC-2 and using a quick calculation,the maximum <br /> 101 building area would be about 43,000 sq.ft. It is very unlikely they can meet that with erosion control standards. Parking <br /> 102 spaces are based on the use that goes in. <br /> 103 <br /> 104 David Blankfard: Is that number based on runoff, impervious surfaces? <br /> 105 <br /> 106 Perdita Holtz: This is in an unprotected watershed so there is not a maximum impervious surface. <br /> 107 <br /> 108 Pat Mallett: In addition to that math, it never gets to that level because you have stormwater control measures, a wet pond. <br /> 109 You also have performance buffers and buffers along the road. Parking is based on use and can range from being based on <br /> 110 number of employees or based on square footage and that ranges from 1 space for every 200 sq.ft. and so forth. When you <br /> 111 do the math it doesn't physically fit. <br /> 112 <br />