Browse
Search
9.7.22 Planning Board Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
9.7.22 Planning Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2022 3:47:00 PM
Creation date
8/31/2022 3:41:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/7/2022
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
9.7.22 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Standards 128 <br /> Section 6.22:Performance Guarantee Standards erformance Gurantee331F <br /> (4) Performance Guarantees shall be used only to complete required construction <br /> activities and shall not be used for repairs or maintenance activities. <br /> (B) ForA.dd0tiQP;al RQq!iiromo^f� _Zoning Compliance Permits and Subdivisions, the following <br /> additional requirements shall apply: <br /> (1) Timing, coverage, duration, extension, legal responsibilities, and release of <br /> guarantees shall be in accordance with the provision of NCGS 160D-804.1 <br /> inclusive. <br /> (2) Guarantees shall not be released for a subdivision proposing development of a <br /> public road until a maintenance guarantee is posted consistent with Section 7.4.8 <br /> of this Ordinance. <br /> (C) For Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs , the following <br /> additional requirements shall apply: <br /> Timinn nneorono dg PQt0nn ov#oncinn lonol rocnnncihilifioc QAd rWQ 5;Q of 204 <br /> (1) All SCMs shall be conditioned on the posting of an SCM Performance <br /> bGPAGuarantee for SCM construction and initial SCM maintenance as detailed <br /> herein.-334 <br /> U The SCM Performance Guarantee costliest estimates shall be sealed by a North <br /> Carolina registered professional engineer or landscape architect (to the extent <br /> that General Statute Chapter 89A allows) , <br /> and shall <br /> include, the costs of the following items: <br /> (a) The value of all materials such as piping and other structures: <br /> (b) Seeding and soil stabilization: <br /> (c) Design and engineering:-- and <br /> (d) Grading, excavation, fill, etc. <br /> (3) The duration of the SCM Performance Guarantee shall initially be one year, <br /> unless the owning entity determines that the scope of work for the required <br /> improvements necessitates a longer duration. In the case of a bonded obligation, <br /> the completion date shall be set one year from the date the bond is issued, <br /> unless the owning entity determines that the scope of work for the required <br /> imQrovements necessitates a longer duration. <br /> (4) The owning entity shall demonstrate reasonable, good-faith progress toward <br /> completing construction of the SCM that is secured by the SCM Performance <br /> Guarantee. If the SCM Performance Guarantee is likely to expire prior to <br /> construction of the SCM in conformance with the approved SMP, then the SCM <br /> Performance Guarantee shall be extended by the owning entity335(prior to <br /> expiration) for the duration necessary to complete construction of the SCM in <br /> conformance with the approved SMP. <br /> (5) The SCM shall be inspected by the Erosion Control Officer after the owning entity <br /> formally notifies the Erosion Control Officer that all SCM-related work has been <br /> completed. Prior to SCM inspection, the owning entity shall provide the following <br /> items to the Erosion Control Officer: <br /> 334 Existing regulations(Section 6.14.10 of the LIDO) requires the postingofa Performance Guarantee covering the <br /> construction and initial operation of an SCM. Staff is merely takingexisting requirements and proposingto move <br /> same into a central section on required 'Performance Guarantees'. <br /> 335 Edit(s)based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina- Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-163 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.