Browse
Search
HPC meeting summary 03232022
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Historic Preservation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2022
>
HPC meeting summary 03232022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2022 4:10:33 PM
Creation date
8/22/2022 4:09:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/23/2022
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
HPC agenda 03232022
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Historic Preservation Commission\Agendas\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County <br /> HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION <br /> Approved Meeting Summary <br /> March 23rd, 2022 <br /> Virtual Meeting via ZOOM <br /> MEMBERS PRESENT: Todd Dickinson, Tom Loter, Art Menius, Cecelia Moore, Paul Noe, Steve Peck, <br /> MEMBERS ABSENT: Ballard <br /> STAFF PRESENT: Peter Sandbeck GUESTS: Fred Stewart <br /> ITEM #1: CALL TO ORDER <br /> Chair Dickinson called the meeting to order at 6:34 pm. <br /> ITEM #2: CHANGES OR ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: None <br /> ITEM #3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES for February 23, 2022 (Attachment 1): Menius moved to <br /> approve the minutes; seconded by Noe; motion approved. <br /> ITEM #4: ITEMS FOR DECISION: None <br /> a. Review of Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed renovations to the Chatwood <br /> Barn: Staff provided an overview of the COA review process. Staff sent certified letters to <br /> the adjoining property owners as per our ordinance, to notify them of the proposed project. <br /> No comments or responses were received. Staff then made a PowerPoint presentation to <br /> give an overview of the proposed project, as described in detail in the Staff Report. Also, <br /> since Preservation North Carolina holds protective covenants on this property, including <br /> the barn, staff checked with PNC's piedmont regional staff member Cathleen Turner to <br /> obtain their opinion. PNC has already reviewed this project and has issued their letter of <br /> approval to the property owners. Staff noted that this barn was originally built c. 1800 on <br /> another rural site in Orange County, and was disassembled and relocated to this site in <br /> the 1940s. The heavy hewn and pit-sawn framing members are the most significant <br /> elements, dating from about 1800 or slightly before, as indicated by some original hand <br /> wrought nails found in the timbers. It is notable for having the special treatment of the <br /> corner posts being hewn to an "L" in section—normally done for residential frames to <br /> accommodate plaster, and not for barns—raising questions about the original use. All the <br /> siding has been replaced, and the roof was altered to provide the present eave <br /> extensions. The shed on the south side dates from the 1940s. The major items of the <br /> proposed work include: new glass doors and a new stone terrace at the west end; a new <br /> door at the east end; an enclosure for a bathroom under the shed, and new single-pane <br /> windows in the gable ends. Staff then introduced project architect Fred Stewart who <br /> provided additional details and explained that one of the most challenging aspects was <br /> providing insulation while allowing the fine original framing system to remain exposed. <br /> They are proposing 2"thick insulated panels installed on the outside of the wall studs, then <br /> applying the siding back over that. Mr. Stewart then answered questions posed by <br /> members. Staff then walked members through the staff report to highlight the standards <br /> that apply to this project. Peck offered a motion stating that the proposed renovation of the <br /> Chatwood Barn as submitted in this application for a COA is congruous with the Design <br /> Standards for Orange County Local Landmarks and meets the relevant sections of the <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.