Browse
Search
8.3.22 Planning Board Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
8.3.22 Planning Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2022 12:32:18 PM
Creation date
8/1/2022 12:25:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/3/2022
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
8.3.22 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Standards 147 <br /> Section 6.22: Performance Guarantee Stand a rdse rforman ce Gurantee329F <br /> (e) The owning entity pays the required 5-year SCM inspection fee as <br /> described in Section 6.14.10(B)(6)of this Ordinance. <br /> that the QeFm� eraI Statute, Chapter 99A, allow) v+u+inc +hua+r th-e de+e4*GR <br /> Pend is nle+e and n is+ent�.Wh the plans ands sifisa+ions <br /> (7) If the SCM passes inspection and the Erosion Control Officer approves all of the <br /> required SCM documents as described in this Ordinance, then the Erosion <br /> Control Officer shallwiU release 75%342 of the value of the SCM Performance <br /> Guarantee and shall-wW issue a Certificate of Stormwater Compliance for the <br /> SCM, subject to approval of the Planning Director. <br /> If the n ent n eotion and the Eresion f en+rel Of oGer a onto the <br /> Gertifination door! nd e onto the a nlir•ant shall file the deed and <br /> easerneRtS yAth the flran..e CO Rty Register f Deeds. The Eresmep-GentrGt <br /> Offir•er shall authorize the release of i in to 7F59 of the value of the nerformanne <br /> wara„tee and issue a Watershed Protegfion Compimange Perm+tee <br /> SCM.343 <br /> (8) If the SCM does not pass inspection and/or the submitted SCM documents are <br /> considered by the Erosion Control Officer to be incomplete, then the Erosion <br /> Control Officer shall direct the owning entity to make any necessary SCM <br /> improvements and/or to resubmit corrected documents for approval.344 Upon <br /> completion, the SCM improvements shall be re-inspected by the Erosion Control <br /> Officer. <br /> If defir•ienr•ies a e fo��nd the Erosion r en+rol Offir�er shall dire.+that+he <br /> Sp for ,al I Inon r• fi nleon +he im en+s shall her er•+ed 345 <br /> (9) No sooner than one year after issuance of the Certificate of Stormwater <br /> Compliance for the SCM, the owning entity may petition the Planning Director to <br /> release the remaining value of the SCM Performance Guarantee. Upon receipt of <br /> said petition, the Erosion Control Officer shall inspect the SCM to determine <br /> whether the SCM is performing as designed and intended. The Erosion Control <br /> Officer shall present the petition, the SCM inspection report, and <br /> recommendations to the Planning Director. <br /> (a) If the Planning Director approves346 the petition and SCM inspection <br /> report, then the Erosion Control Officer shall release the remaining value <br /> of the SCM Performance Guarantee. <br /> If the Planning Director does not accept the petition and/or SCM <br /> inspection, then the Erosion Control Officer shall provide the owning <br /> entity with instructions to correct any SCM deficiencies necessary for the <br /> release of the remaining value of the SCM Performance Guarantee.9f+e <br /> aqFeeMen+ the a nlisant may Petition for the release of+he r <br /> glue of the nerfbrmaRGe Q antee <br /> I Inon r in+of said ne+i+ion the-Erosion fen+rel Offi..er shall <br /> Cf`NA +o determine whether the Gen+rels aFe erformin.. as designed and <br /> Ira#enaed. If they are,the r g f„nds sha:rae�etu,,Ted. ITrE*, tl e <br /> Erosion Cnn+rol (lffir•er .,ill note ideas+ifed defir ienr ies and r <br /> 14'Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> 44D <br /> sa4 Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> 4� <br /> 141 Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-164 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.