Browse
Search
8.3.22 Planning Board Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
8.3.22 Planning Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2022 12:32:18 PM
Creation date
8/1/2022 12:25:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/3/2022
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
8.3.22 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Standards 146 <br /> Section 6.22: Performance Guarantee Stand a rdse rforman ce Gurantee329F <br /> (a) Draft plat(s) and334 deed(s)for any required SCM maintenance <br /> easement(s)or draft subdivision plat(s) and335 deed(s)that contain any <br /> required SCM maintenance easement(s), ready for recording with the <br /> Orange County Register of Deeds. The draft plat(s) and336 deed(s) shall <br /> be reviewed and approved by the Erosion Control Officer prior to <br /> recordation by the owning entity. <br /> (b) Draft SCM Operation and Maintenance Agreement(OMA), ready for <br /> recording with the Orange County Register of Deeds. The draft OMA <br /> shall be reviewed and approved by the Erosion Control Officer prior to <br /> recordation by the owning entity. <br /> (c) SCM certification letter sealed by a North Carolina registered <br /> professional engineer or landscape architect (to the extent that General <br /> Statute Chapter 89A allows), stating that the SCM is complete and <br /> consistent with the approved SMP. <br /> (d) SCM as-built drawing(s) sealed by a North Carolina registered <br /> Professional Engineer or Landscape Architect(to the extent that General <br /> Statute Chapter 89A allows), stating that the SCM is complete and <br /> consistent with the approved SMP. <br /> (6) The SCM Performance Guarantee shall not be released feraa-SG s-until the <br /> T following requirements are met: <br /> (a) The SCM passes inspection by the Erosion Control Officer. NOTE: The <br /> SCM will pass inspection if/when the Erosion Control Officer determines <br /> that the SCM is performing as designed and intended per the approved <br /> SMP;337_ <br /> (b) MAP SCM Operation and Maintenance Agreement (OMA) in <br /> conformance with Section 6.14 of this Ordinance )-has been ste <br /> %viewreviewed and /approved by the Erosion Control Officer and <br /> subsequently, recorded by the owning entity at the Orange <br /> County Register of Deeds; nrtjAn^^ with Re6+i^n a ,n ^f +his <br /> 9rd+na�►s�� <br /> The signed SCM maintenance easement-d <br /> �h�np�the <br /> rGsoen Green fnceiA-.nrce the f 110 Minn infrrm o+iron i? <br /> 339 <br /> (c) The—,;gff�e"eed(s) and340 plat(s), or subdivision deed(s) and341 plats(s) <br /> in conformance with Section 6.14 of this Ordinance have been <br /> reviewed/approved by the Erosion Control Officer and subsequently <br /> recorded by the owning entity at the Orange County, relater! ^as <br /> plat f.,r the 212AA ready fGF fillip .With the rerun ^ r„ ,n+„ <br /> Registers of Deeds;- <br /> The SCM certification letter and the SCM as-built drawing(s), <br /> (d) sealed by an engineer or landscape architect (to the extent that the <br /> General Statute Chapter 89A allows), have been reviewed/approved by <br /> the Erosion Control Officer;- <br /> 334 Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> ass Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> 3s6 Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> 3s7 Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> tong r r, nt(s) as detailed it Section c 1 n 1n of the i Inn <br /> 110 Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> 141 Edit(s) based on Legal Sufficiency Review comments. <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-163 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.