Orange County NC Website
11 <br /> Qu stion 1: What is on hop and on f ar about this County Wid Racial Equity Fram work? <br /> decreased orwarce"ion need to center pac <br /> it wrxrt prodncF resits tt�une to.. change et we nit 6e errecire <br /> d voices head hope is a cc nrvtrnertt ba c work wil stay abstrm-t <br /> tAn4rCe Incid Y'tegvitieS tear wastod UM <br /> t` true change vwd happen <br /> W by most affected eattenguyemerR x7nr4r,-1tyjN' ,,,W-,10 <br /> orx�tttcrempty rrttattvc rK"wrongs <br /> not vVionented <br /> grttngtoroots UndelSt[]nllVnfJ big ideas-truttx rims <br /> iw:,d«rty usbcefor Go Same Coe Po tics <br /> embrucle Un r ieam a ass <br /> cortrrwct G O fl"?r- f 11�Y ° neat cr,angc <br /> bcttNbarotive coaabo=m C bipac art r-tory <br /> Ouness fL4 ati c grange reduced dtsprxttes <br /> everyone>sareaa safeconapern 0 equity d,,, cl*Ao eocc--s <br /> tem- gig v inclusive trwomuchpracess ; Inckewleerless nxdhenbc <br /> L It <br /> structural <br /> tructural changes seen shifts pc 't <br /> VO <br /> some ofcommunity <br /> gat'--wePov duty Perne rY�fh <br /> no baoaa hen <br /> V <br /> CA talc no acne, <br /> peobltvn saivirK2 ftim i �to Impact <br /> v <br /> reb3gab wd be polvt r.-.:.v i nape its usef A <br /> o rt <br /> Mdownges standardsettngastate nored changes o <br /> 0rUC al work doegm ertgagelinent w itc <br /> rocidMPAy to not maku a cltference <br /> rw*dacbonnow w.;r.r;�.:-ern- <br /> Again, Mentimete was used to display the attendees esponses to the question below. The image below <br /> displays one f ame containing nine esponses to the second question aised. Reponses we e o ganized <br /> into themes and se ved as the bases fo the pape and elect onic su veys used in to geted p esentations. <br /> T <br /> The community p io itized the following acial equity esults. In total,the a we a 660 esponses. It is <br /> impo tant to note that the majo ity of the esponses below we a gathe ed f om the O ange County Toy <br /> Chest to get community engagement. <br /> 285 Imp oved Education Outcomes fo Child en of Colo <br /> 285 Inc eased Affo dable Housing Options <br /> 119 Inc eased Decision-Making Oppo tunities fo People of Colo <br /> 108 Inc eased Influence on Budget/Resou ce Allocations <br /> 162 Inc eased Employment Oppo tunities fo People of Colo <br /> 157 Imp oved Health Outcomes fo People of Colo <br /> 82 Inc eased Community Engagement fo People of Colo <br /> 82 Inc eased Local Gove nment Accountability to Communities of Colo <br /> 140 Inc eased Oppo tunities fo Youth Voice(s) <br /> 146 Dec eased C iminal Justice Involvement fo People of Colo <br /> 138 Inc eased Community Unity <br />