Orange County NC Website
DocuSign Envelope ID:9A676531-F35E-4E66-B48C-3107043DBD2E <br /> Cates Creek Apartments LLC PIN 9873251980 <br /> Alexander Carr elected not to appear before the Board and requested that the submitted documentation <br /> serve as the appeal. The appellant is appealing the value of the property located at 100 Waterstone Park <br /> Circle,Hillsborough. The current assessed value of the property is $36,494,000.A list of evidence <br /> follows: <br /> APPELLANT COUNTY <br /> 9873251980 Appeal 9873251980 County <br /> Cyle Anderson represented the County and stated the subject property is a 270-unit apartment complex <br /> built in 2015 and the appellant is requesting a valuation of$33,412,000 for the property based on 2020 <br /> income and expenses for the property. <br /> Mr. Anderson stated that upon review of this property by CCA, CCA weighted the sales comparison <br /> approach at 45%and the income approach at 55%for a reconciled valuation of$36,745,844 for the <br /> property As a result of this review, Orange County recommends applying an E01 neighborhood modifier <br /> for a revised valuation of$36,129,700. <br /> The Board reviewed all documents and information provided by the appellant and the County. After <br /> deliberation and review,Mr. Beattie made a motion to accept the County's revised valuation of <br /> $36,129,700. Ms. Levine seconded the motion and the motion carried. <br /> Yes: 3 <br /> Noes: 0 <br /> William Geoffrey Brantley Trust PIN 9893410649 <br /> William Brantley elected not to appear before the Board and requested that the submitted documentation <br /> serve as the appeal. The appellant is appealing the value of the property located at 6709 Mt. Hermon <br /> Church Road, Durham. The current assessed value of the property is $1,539,700.A list of evidence <br /> follows: <br /> APPELLANT COUNTY <br /> 9893410649 Appeal 9893410649 County <br /> The appellant requests a valuation of$1,200,000 for the property based on an appraisal with an effective <br /> valuation date of January 13,2021 and an opinion of value of$1,200,000 for the property. <br /> Cyle Anderson represented the County and stated that the subject property is a warehouse building with <br /> office space, and after reviewing both the property and the appraisal,the County recommends reducing <br /> the grade from B to C+10 and reducing the effective year built from 2005 to 1997. These changes would <br /> result in a revised valuation of$1,194,200 for the property. <br /> The Board reviewed all documents and information provided by the appellant and the County. After <br /> deliberation and review,Mr.Beattie made a motion to accept the County's revised valuation of <br /> $1,194,200 for the property. Mr. Meyers seconded the motion and the motion carried. <br />