Orange County NC Website
DocuSign Envelope ID: D94409AB-B2D5-4E05-B3FC-26A40C01CO2F <br /> Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company PIN 9880363419 <br /> Tom Sanders appeared before the Board to appeal the value of 1.48 acres on Perkins Drive, Chapel Hill. <br /> The current assessed value of the property is $148,300. A list of evidence follows: <br /> APPELLANT COUNTY <br /> 9880363419 Appeal 9880363419 County <br /> The appellant provided a survey of the 1.48 acre property adjacent to an area apartment complex and <br /> explained that with a Duke Energy overhead power line easement and other easements through the site, <br /> the subject cannot be developed and generate income and is basically just a public use property. The <br /> appellant referred the Board to a similar nearby parcel,PIN 9880261499,which has a value of$13,700. <br /> Based on this property,the appellant feels the value of the subject property should be $20,075. <br /> Jimmy Milliken represented the County and stated that upon review of the subject property,the County <br /> determined that the property is not buildable and suggests the Use adjustment on the land be changed <br /> from-90%to -98%leading to a revised valuation of$29,700 for the property. <br /> The Board reviewed all documents and information provided by the appellant and the County. After <br /> deliberation and review,Mr. Beattie made a motion to accept the County's revised valuation of$29,700 <br /> for the property. Ms. Levine seconded the motion and the motion carried. <br /> Yes: 3 <br /> Noes: 0 <br /> Tri City Investments LLC PIN 9799692931 <br /> Michael Benak from McCarter&English appeared before the Board to appeal the value of the ouproperty <br /> located at 1801 Fordham Boulevard, Chapel Hill. The current assessed value of the property is <br /> $16,045,200.A list of evidence follows: <br /> APPELLANT COUNTY <br /> 9799692931 Appeal 9799692931 County <br /> The appellant stated that the prior assessment of the subject property was around$8 million and the <br /> current$125 per square foot valuation is significantly higher than the other Lowe's Home Improvement <br /> stores throughout the state. Mr. Benak referenced documentation and stated that his firm had represented <br /> Lowe's Home Improvement in many tax appeals throughout the state, and have consistently settled these <br /> appeals at$65 per square foot for these stores' values. Mr. Benak stated that the income approach for the <br /> subject property would indicate a value of$56 per square foot for the subject,but based on the values of <br /> other area Lowe's Home Improvements,the appellant is requesting a value of$60 per square foot or <br /> $7,686,000 for the subject property. <br /> Kelly Wells represented the County and stated that upon review of this property by CCA, CCA weighted <br /> the sales comparison approach at 40%and the income approach at 60% for a reconciled valuation of <br />