2021_09_23 BOER MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DocuSign Envelope ID:8EEOC110-25FB-4277-885A-903A2EFOD2C9 Clearance Hill elected not to appear before the Board but has requested that the submitted documentation serve as the appeal. Mr.Hill is appealing the value of a 2.65-acre vacant lot located on Lebanon Road, Mebane. The current Orange County assessed value is$58,600. A list of evidence follows: APPELLANT COUNTY 9825885266 Appeal 9825885266 County The appellant opinion of value is $14,500. In his evidence,the appellant stated that only a portion of the land is buildable due to the shape of the parcel. Heidi Whetzel represented the County. Ms.Whetzel stated that she reviewed the subject property and other comparable properties. After reviewing aerial photos in GIS of the subject property, it was determined that the shape of the parcel rendered a portion of the land unbuildable. Giving this finding, Ms. Whetzel recommended adding a-40%adjustment factor for shape which would render a revised value of$35,100. The Board reviewed all documents and information provided by the appellant and the County. After deliberation and review,Mr. Beattie made a motion to accept the County's recommend change and revised value of$35,100. Ms. Levine seconded the motion and the motion carried. Yes: 3 Noes: 0 WESTBROOK PIN 9834094915 Doug Westbrook elected not to appear before the Board and requested that the submitted documentation serve as the appeal. Mr.Westbrook is appealing the values of four properties.Their locations and values are listed below. Heidi Whetzel represented the County. A list of evidence follows: APPELLANT COUNTY 9834094915 Appeal 9834094915 County 9835006065 Appeal 9835006065 County 9834189593 Appeal 9834189593 County 9834093602 Appeal 9834093602 County PIN 9834094915 located at 6712 E. Washington St.,Mebane. The current Orange County assessed value is $25,400. In his evidence,the appellant listed an opinion of value of$17,400 stating that the property is landlocked. Ms. Whetzel stated the she reviewed the subject property and other comparable properties and noted that the subject property currently has a-20%no access adjustment on the land. Therefore she stated that no land adjustment was recommended. The Board reviewed all documents and information provided by the appellant and the County. After deliberation and review,Mr. Beattie made a motion to accept the County's recommendation to make no change to the value. Ms. Levine seconded the motion and the motion carried. Yes: 3 Noes: 0