Browse
Search
2021_08_25 BOER MINUTES
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021_08_25 BOER MINUTES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 3:40:46 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 3:36:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DocuSign Envelope ID: E275D4DE-CD48-4919-BE2A-D86FEADF0352 <br /> Yes: 3 <br /> Noes: 0 <br /> Vandy Enterprises LLC PIN 9874064150 <br /> Toby Vandemark appeared before the Board to appeal the valuation of the property located at 110 S. <br /> Churton Street,Hillsborough. The current assessed value of the property is $710,600. A list of evidence <br /> follows: <br /> APPELLANT COUNTY <br /> 9874064150 Appeal 9874064150 County <br /> The appellant is requesting that the Board lower the valuation citing the fact that the neighboring <br /> properties on S. Churton Street have lower valuations than the subject property. The appellant provided a <br /> 2020 income and expense statement for the property and assessed values of similar nearby properties <br /> indicating that the increase in value from the revaluation was greater for the subject than similar nearby <br /> properties. <br /> Cyle Anderson represented the County and stated that the property is currently recorded as a two story <br /> commercial building having 4.416 square feet of finished area with 2,208 square foot of restaurant space <br /> on the first floor and 2,208 square foot of residential apartment space on the second floor. Mr. Anderson <br /> stated that it was brought to the attention of the Tax Office that the finished area of the second floor was <br /> overstated by 216 square feet as the second floor space included an unheated porch area. The County <br /> recommends correcting the second floor finished area to 1,992 square feet and the overall finished area of <br /> the building to 4,200 square feet. <br /> Mr. Anderson explained that upon review of the property by CCA,the indicated value of the property <br /> from the sales comparison approach was $712,223 and the indicated value of the property from the <br /> income approach was $543,012.Due to the nature of this property, CCA placed 45%weight on the sales <br /> comparison approach and 55%weight on the income approach for a reconciled value of$619,157. <br /> As a result of this review and in addition to the recommended finished area correction,the County <br /> recommends removing the+25%market adjustment on the land, changing the effective year built of the <br /> building from 2015 to 2010 and applying an E01 economic market adjustment to the property for a <br /> revised valuation of$618,400 for the property. <br /> Chris Mashburn clarified the three comparable sales were found by identifying sales of other properties <br /> with similar building sizes and location attributes. For the sales comparison approach,the resulting <br /> valuation indicated approximately$177 per square foot. The income approach was based on the income <br /> generated from leasing the restaurant and second floor apartment. <br /> The Board reviewed all documents and information provided by the appellant and the County. After <br /> deliberation and review,Mr.Beattie made a motion to accept the County's recommended revised value of <br /> $618,400. Mr. Meyers seconded the motion and the motion carried. <br /> Yes: 3 <br /> Noes: 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.