Orange County NC Website
45 <br /> 1 Slide #5 <br /> Sulo-Committee Research <br /> Survey to current and former members <br /> — 70%said Cliiwte Council added value <br /> Collaboration,relationships primary benefit <br /> No clear understanding of mission,Inconsistent parlielpalion primary <br /> weaknesses <br /> — Need to defrre specific ci}srge, responsibilities,and relalioftship with member <br /> governments <br /> Review of Existing Models <br /> — Intergovernmental Parks Work Group <br /> . Informabonshmi g and collaboration <br /> — Parlm hrp to End Homelessness. <br /> • Formal role me conn wum of care+murhpa sdicdonel furbding+dedicated etaff <br /> — Food Council <br /> Mulhauiedictionsi funcbW+debated slaff <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> hNX')ItT1 r CARG1LtN.i <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Travis Myren said that twelve surveys were returned. He said that the unclear <br /> 4 understanding of mission and participation were weaknesses. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Slide #6 <br /> Sub-Committee Recommendations <br /> mendation <br /> Use Intergovernmental Perks Work Group Model <br /> Not an advisory board,of the County <br /> Sixteen(16)members representirig institutions <br /> - County,ToWnsr OwASA, UNC and UNC Health,Coo native Extension, <br /> Durham Tech,Chamber of Commerce <br /> Charge <br /> - Share information,engage with community,identify opportunities for <br /> collaboratl�an <br /> Meeting frequency <br /> - Three times per year <br /> ORANGE COUNT.T <br /> h,ORI r CAAG_IN <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Travis Myren said they recommended decreasing the membership numbers and <br /> 9 meeting less frequently. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br />