Orange County NC Website
30 <br /> Slide #8 <br /> Further Appeals: North Carolina Property Tax <br /> Commission <br /> f Property owners who are not satisfied with the declsion of the BOER have the right to appeal <br /> to the North Carolina Property Tax Commission (NO PTO) within 30 days of the pate of the <br /> Notice or Decision recelved In response to the BOER Hearing. <br /> The NCPTC requires that the appellant send notice of their Intent to appeal the BOER <br /> d eision to the NCPTC: and the County.AddMnal ly the NCPTC: requires that the appellant <br /> nd them a copy of the BOER notice, and com pletelretu rn a farm AV-14, which Is provided <br /> by the NCPTC when the appeal Is recelved. <br /> There were 12 appealsfor 2021 values to the Property Tax Commission inc Iudinga total of <br /> 20 parcels.Three properties owned by one appellant have been dismissed due to <br /> untimeliness. None or the properties appealed were in the Northslde Review area_ <br /> The average number or appeals to the NCPTC, for the last three years Is seven. In <br /> comparison, in 2017, the last revaluation year,there were 29 appeals to the NCPTS, <br /> Slide #9 <br /> Results of the North ideAppeals <br /> - After revaluatlon notices were mailed, Tax OVIce was made aware of Iroconslstencles In <br /> the valuation of properlies identified its Cthapel Hill's Northside Neighborhood <br /> Oomervatian piistrictand Oarrboro's Lloyd[Broad Neighborhood Preservation District <br /> - There were 191 informal appeals and 51 formal appeals in the ideritified areas.23 of <br /> the formal Wats were the result or an Informal appeal. <br /> + At the informal level, there was a net reduotion of 57.859.135 155 parcels had a <br /> reduction,with: the average amount of$71,925. 31 Increased In value, average of <br /> $106.1 H-5 properties had no change. <br /> - OF these 51 Formal appeals there was a net decreaseof$1.882,500.35 of the <br /> properties decreased in value, 15 inoreasedi5 value, and 1 had ria change. The <br /> Average decrease was$86.217 and the average irrcreasewas$75.673 <br /> Ori July 28,the Tax Office requested that the Board of Equalization and Review <br /> exercise its power and Mies as Hated in NO General 8tatuie 105-322(g)(1)(b,o_d) <br /> and requested the Tax Office review the remaining approxl maL4y 472 propertles In the <br /> Identlfled areas that had not been appealed and make any necessary corrections to <br /> these properties arrd Chair values to be oorisistent with the actions taker~orr properties <br /> that were informally or formally appealed <br />