|
Article 4: Overlay Zoning Districts 49
<br /> Section 4.2:Watershed Protection
<br /> 4.2.10 Orange County Watershed Matrix105
<br /> Table 4.2.10 defines the land disturbance area thresholds (in square feet)that tripper the need for
<br /> an Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan and/or a Stormwater Management Plan.
<br /> 4.2.1
<br /> Back Creek 20,000 21,780 43,560 **NA **NA
<br /> E Haw Creek 20,000 21,780 43,560 **NA **NA
<br /> Q **NA **NA
<br /> Cane Creek *10,000 21,780 43,560
<br /> 3
<br /> Cane Creek Critical Area *10,000 21,780 43,560 **NA **NA
<br /> w = Haw River(protected) 20,000 21,780 43,560 **NA **NA
<br /> w Haw River(unprotected) 20,000 21,780 43,560 **NA **NA
<br /> a-
<br /> Q **NA **NA
<br /> Ul E Jordan Lake(unprotected) 20,000 21,780 43,560
<br /> ** **
<br /> Jordan Lake(protected) 20,000 21,780 43,560 NA NA
<br /> 0
<br /> _ **NA **NA
<br /> 3 University Lake *10,000 21,780 43,560
<br /> a)
<br /> Z **NA **NA
<br /> � University Lake Critical Area *10,000 21,780 43,560
<br /> Flat River 20,000 12,000 21,780 2.2 0.33
<br /> Little River 20,000 12,000 21,780 2.2 0.33
<br /> a�
<br /> Lu J Upper Eno *10,000 12,000 21,780 2_2 0.33
<br /> z @ Upper Eno Critical Area *10,000 12,000 21,780 2.2 0.33
<br /> LL
<br /> Lower Eno (unprotected) 20,000 12,000 21,780 2.2 0.33
<br /> Lower Eno (protected) 20,000 12,000 21,780 2.2 0.33
<br /> Y Hvco Creek 20,000 NA NA NA NA
<br /> O
<br /> z
<br /> Q
<br /> 0 South Hvco Creek 20,000 43,560 43,560 NA NA
<br /> *Waiver required.
<br /> **Jordan Lake nutrient export regulations are not currently enforced, in compliance with State mandate.
<br /> Orange County will resume enforcement of nutrient export regulations if/when the State mandate is revised.
<br /> NOTES:
<br /> [11 Thresholds are listed in square feet(SF).
<br /> [21 Not part of larger development.
<br /> [31 Nutrients listed in pounds/acre/year.
<br /> [41 43,560 square feet= 1 acre.
<br /> [51 21,780 square feet /Y acre.
<br /> [61 10,890 square feet='/4 acre.
<br /> [71 A site plan may also be constrained by stream buffer requirements and impervious surface
<br /> limitations, in addition to typical zoning setback requirements.
<br /> 105 NEW TABLE. Peer review comments included suggestion to move new Table 4.2.10 to a new Section 4.2.10.
<br /> Orange County, North Carolina-Unified Development Ordinance Page 4-14
<br />
|