Browse
Search
5.4.22 Planning Board Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
5.4.22 Planning Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 3:31:27 PM
Creation date
4/28/2022 3:25:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/4/2022
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
5.4.22 Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 <br /> Plan submittal is not considered complete until the appropriate review fees have been <br /> paid in full.47 <br /> (A)(13) Once an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan has been determined to be complete <br /> by the Erosion Control Officer and the appropriate review fees have been paid in full, <br /> theT-4e Erosion Control Officer shall within 30 business days rpv4p ,o;;^h ^^mpleto <br /> eros on and speddi.M.P—Ptafip—n Pla.n 16--i-Mitted- and- within 30 days <br /> of receipt thereof will notify the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan that it has <br /> beenapplicant in writing that the complete Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan has <br /> been: <br /> (1) Approved, <br /> (2) Approved with modifications, or <br /> (ZC�)Approved with Ge„d itions, <br /> (4) Approved with perfermanGe reservatio,ns,048 <br /> (5)(3) Disapproved. <br /> (13)LLExamples of approvals with modifications includeconditi ns of approval are, but are not <br /> limited to: <br /> (1) Channel stabilization must be successful or another type of lining must be used; <br /> (2) Delineating certain areas to be graded and stabilized within a specified number <br /> of days to reduce the potential for erosion and protect critical areas; <br /> (3) Providing a performance security provide id permanent ground coyer��_ _ana or <br /> (4)L3LRequiring the PeFSGn finaRGially ro sob4eFinancially Responsible Party to <br /> retain the services of a professional engineer or architect to supervise <br /> implementation of the approved Eresienr Erosion and Sedimentation Control <br /> PIanSerrtrel RlaR. <br /> (q(D) Disapproval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan-p4R must specifically state in <br /> writing the reasons for disapproval. <br /> 2.19.6 Timeframe for Review of New Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans" <br /> Failure by the Erosion Control Officer to approve, approve with ,.ORditiens approve with <br /> modifications,or disapprove a complete new Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan submittal <br /> within 30 calendar days of the date at which the new Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan <br /> submittal was determined by the Erosion Control Officer to be complete receipt of the GE)Mpl8te <br /> orP,;0Pn end j;Pd*mont.,t,„n nnntrr,l ni,p pl,p shall be deemed aan approval of the Erosion and <br /> Sedimentation Control Plan.50 <br /> 2.19.7 Required Revisions <br /> (A) If, following commencement of a ' Land-Disturbinq Activity pursuant <br /> to an approved plan rosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, the Erosion Control Officer <br /> determines that the pla-R- rosion and Sedimentation Control Plan is inadequate to meet <br /> the requirements of the 6ei�51erosion and sedimentation provisions of this Ordinance, the <br /> Erosion Control Officer may require any revision of the plan-Erosion and Sedimentation <br /> 47 Added clarification here that a plan submittal is not considered complete until review fees are paid. <br /> 48"Approved with conditions"and "Approved with performance reservations" have been eliminated based on <br /> most current NCAC changes(15A NCAC 046.0118), revised based on NCDEQ peer review comment. <br /> 4'Text correction—added "s". <br /> so This section was clarified/refined based on NCDEQ peer review comment. <br /> si Deleted "soil". <br /> Orange County, North Carolina—Unified Development Ordinance Page 3-Ixv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.