Browse
Search
Agenda 04-26-22; 6-c - Report of the Climate Council Review Sub-Committee
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
Agenda - 04-26-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 04-26-22; 6-c - Report of the Climate Council Review Sub-Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2022 4:11:46 PM
Creation date
4/21/2022 4:03:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/26/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-c
Document Relationships
Agenda for April 26, 2022 Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2022\Agenda - 04-26-2022 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> Primary Themes: Collaboration of technically competent council members, development <br /> of relationships between members, foundational work of council <br /> • What elements of the Climate Council's work are not going well? <br /> Primary Themes: No clear understanding of mission, purpose, goals and responsibilities. <br /> Inconsistent attendance/participation by some council members. <br /> • What is your perspective on the size, structure, and representation on the Climate <br /> Council? <br /> Primary Themes: No consistent opinion on size. Many commented on representation, <br /> indicating the council should seek wider representation outside of government, and more <br /> diversity. <br /> • What role should staff play? <br /> Primary Themes: Pretty evenly split between active members and technical support only. <br /> • What would be included in an ideal Climate Council work plan? <br /> Primary Themes: A specific charge from the governments, Definition of the relation of <br /> the council to the county (i.e., advisory?) and municipal governments, Brainstorming <br /> Existing Models for Collaboration <br /> Based on the feedback from members, the Sub-Committee recognized the value of an <br /> intergovernmental group focused on information sharing and collaboration. The County and the <br /> Towns currently have three formal models for collaboration. <br /> • Intergovernmental Parks Work Group <br /> The Intergovernmental Parks Work Group was created through a resolution that was <br /> adopted by the elected boards of Orange County, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough and Carrboro. <br /> That resolution was accompanied by a governing document that outlined the <br /> membership, detailed a meeting frequency of three times per year, and established the <br /> group's charge. <br /> The charge to the Intergovernmental Parks Work Group included seven (7) goals. <br /> 1. To gather, exchange and share information on parks planning and development in the <br /> municipalities and County. <br /> 2. To maintain and update the Inventory of Parks and Recreation Facilities developed as part <br /> of the Joint Master Recreation and Parks report, including new properties acquired or <br /> dedicated <br /> 3. To foster communication between the municipalities and County on future opportunities <br /> and collaborative ventures <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.