Browse
Search
Agenda 04-26-22; 4-b - Durham & Orange Transit Plan Governance Study – Interim Update
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
Agenda - 04-26-2022 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 04-26-22; 4-b - Durham & Orange Transit Plan Governance Study – Interim Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2022 4:10:18 PM
Creation date
4/21/2022 4:00:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/26/2022
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4-b
Document Relationships
Agenda for April 26, 2022 Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2022\Agenda - 04-26-2022 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> Durham-Orange Transit Governance Study <br /> BOCC Interim Update Memo—Spring 2022 <br /> transportation investment. Goals of the interviews were to capture needs,wants and desires for how a new <br /> governance framework should serve the local and regional communities within and across the two counties. <br /> Joint Elected Officials Workshop (Nov'21)—Facilitated a half-day forum, which included elected officials from <br /> each County and each local municipality within each County,to build on the Initial Stakeholder Interviews and <br /> begin to quantify desired level of change to be made on major elements that support a governance <br /> framework. A majority of elected officials in attendance indicated that there should be some aspect of change <br /> with almost every element highlighted. Such elements included: <br /> • changing the structure to allow for more collaboration between municipalities within each County <br /> (83%indicated more collaboration was needed), <br /> • defining a significant change in voting representation (both for governing board roles& <br /> responsibilities, as well as staff representation on the technical recommending body,the Staff Working <br /> Group; 100%indicated some level of change from existing framework regarding voting <br /> representation), and <br /> • as well as defining how the annual budget development and decision-making process to meet the <br /> desired change for greater representation (67%indicated that some level of change was necessary to <br /> better define/guide the annual budget development and decision-making process). <br /> Wake County Transit Program Peer Interview (Dec'21)—learned from neighboring peer to the east, Wake <br /> County, regarding successes and challenges relative to the governance framework supporting the Wake <br /> County Transit Plan/Program. <br /> Alternatives Development (Jan-Feb'22)—alternative concepts for consideration in a new governance <br /> framework were reviewed and developed. While peer examples were used as models to inform initial <br /> direction,the concept of a comprehensive governance framework was deconstructed to focus on the critical <br /> elements that were necessary for collaborative dialogue during joint stakeholder workshops by all <br /> stakeholders before moving forward. <br /> Joint Staff Workshop#1 (Mar'22)—Facilitated a half-day workshop with staff from each of the four <br /> coordinating organizations (Durham &Orange Counties, DCHC-MPO and GoTriangle), as well as staff from City <br /> of Durham/GoDurham,Town of Chapel Hill/Chapel Hill Transit and Orange Public Transit.This workshop <br /> focused on 17 proposed alternatives (each with a proposed recommendation)for consideration across 5 major <br /> elements that should comprise a transit plan governance framework.These 5 major elements are: <br /> • Membership <br /> • Voting Structures <br /> • Financial Planning <br /> • Multi-Year Plan Development <br /> • Annual Work Program Development <br /> Workshop participants were asked to provide feedback on each proposed alternative and the indicated <br /> recommendation. Upon conclusion of each topic's discussion, a 'pulse-check' confirmation was sought to <br /> provide direction on how to best incorporate language in draft governance documents. Many proposed <br /> recommended alternatives were met with consensus by all participants. Where a consensus was not met, one <br /> or more parties offered an alternative perspective for further consideration by all parties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.