Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
13 <br /> resolution of analysis with more land use types and by different areas. It should be noted that <br /> both studies (past and present) only related to the County revenue/expenditure program and <br /> not the cost revenue benefit realized in municipalities. This study could also be modified to <br /> include the municipalities at additional expense. <br /> This study and its findings do not have a direct relationship in the Unified Development <br /> Ordinance (UDO). Whether a project has a net positive or negative is not the basis of an <br /> approval or denial but may be considered in some legislative decisions. <br /> Julie Herlands of TischlerBise, Inc. will provide a PowerPoint on the findings and address any <br /> comments and questions, and County staff will also assist with questions and answers. <br /> Craig Benedict, Planning and Inspections Director, reviewed the background information <br /> for the item. He said that he is hoping staff will refine this model on an annual basis. <br /> Julie Herlands of TischlerBise, Inc. gave the following PowerPoint presentation: <br /> Slide #1 <br /> Inc <br /> Slide #2 <br /> Fiscal Impact Analysis in General <br /> • Evaluating cash flow to the public sector <br /> o Do revenues that are generated from a development cover cost impacts? <br /> • Based on a jurisdiction's current level of service—reflected In current budget <br /> • Intent is to help achieve planning and fiscal goals by understanding the <br /> connection between land use decisions and revenue generationloperating <br /> Impacts <br /> a Models are built to address specific questions <br /> • Fiscalimpact analysis differs from Economic lmpactAnafysis and Municipal <br /> Budgeting <br /> nkhsch erkise <br />