Browse
Search
Minutes 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2022
>
Minutes 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2022 12:05:06 PM
Creation date
3/16/2022 12:03:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/8/2022
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 02-08-22; 1 - Realignment of Regional Workforce Development Boards
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda 02-08-22; 2 - Efland Area Water and Sewer Presentation with Status Report on Interstate Properties in the Efland Area and Possibilities for Development-Economic Development
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda 02-08-22; 3 - Agricultural Preservation Board – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda 02-08-22; 4 - Chapel Hill Library Advisory Board – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda 02-08-22; 5 - Chapel Hill Orange County Visitors Bureau Advisory Board – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda 02-08-22; 6 - Hillsborough Planning Board – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda 02-08-22; 7 - Human Relations Commission – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda 02-08-22; 8 - Orange County Parks and Recreation Council – Appointment Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda 02-08-22; 9 - Orange County Planning Board – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
Agenda for February 8, 2022 Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2022\Agenda - 02-08-2022 Virtual Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> Slide #5 <br /> Watersh ed s Buckh o rn EDD& H i Ilsbor-o ugh ED D <br /> .1, <br /> I M1: 1! ]11 YI <br /> L%SL 1 <br /> I .. <br /> If I U ppar E na <br /> Naw Cjt&k <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> 1�I Lower Erro <br /> 4aw C►eek ,., Cane Creek #k a° + <br /> ( I�IX <br /> ].5,{ti - <br /> I �� hSIMIS <br /> .- <br /> �YfS� <br /> Craig Benedict reviewed the information in the background materials regarding state <br /> rules for watershed protection versus the higher amount Orange County. He said no EDDs are <br /> located in critical watershed areas. He said that the Upper Eno watershed was designated a <br /> critical area by Orange County. He said that in the late 1980s the county studied placing a <br /> reservoir in the Upper Eno watershed, but that is no longer a consideration. <br /> Craig Benedict referred back to slide #4. He said there is additional water and sewer <br /> capacity through agreements with Mebane. He said that water and sewer lines built by the <br /> county are now Mebane's responsibility to maintain. <br /> Commissioner Richards asked for confirmation that the Upper Eno watershed is a <br /> hypothetical area, which equates to six times more than what the state requires of the county <br /> and is based on a theoretical reservoir that never came to fruition and will never come to be. <br /> Craig Benedict said she was correct. He said the county has purchased a lot of <br /> properties in that watershed for preservation purposes but there is no opportunity for a future <br /> reservoir in that area. <br /> Commissioner Richards asked for confirmation that it is county-owned land, designated <br /> for preservation. She asked if she is correct that it would not be eligible for any development. <br /> Craig Benedict said she was correct. <br /> Commissioner Richards asked for confirmation that the West Ten Road sewer system <br /> can be upgraded. <br /> Craig Benedict said it can be upgraded. He said there is an upgrade planned to put <br /> sewer under the interstate. He said that the engineering design pumps one way but, in the <br /> future, they can pump to where there is more capacity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.