Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> 1 Slide #5 <br /> STAKEHOLDERS UPDATE.WORI GROUP GUTPUTAND FOLLOW UP <br /> • Purptrss. Engage all stakeholders who are likely to have an Follow-up.'1' ill be following up on rhe accion Items over <br /> operational relationship with the Facility and its staff. Che next several months to ensure policies,procedures.and <br /> • Who.Subcommittee facilitated 5 Smkeholders orkgroup practices Among various stakeholders and the Facility are <br /> meetings and engaged over 15 representatives of Orange aligned.7his work will parallel the design and operations <br /> Counrr orgganlxatlons:EMS,OM,CHI}D, planningfor Che facility. <br /> CourtsNagistrate, juvenile justice,public schools, Contents of Stal6aeholder Action Pbn: <br /> Npa rtment of Social Services,VNC EDIPES,Individuals A.EMS <br /> Involved In sobering services. B.law Enforcement <br /> Focus.Discussion centered on how each group might use .Coures,+hlaglsCraaeFRetantion Center <br /> the Fackllcy and what inputthey have regarding Facility D.Juvenlle Justice <br /> services that would best support their programs, E, Social Services and Schools <br /> Rosults.An action plan for fallow up with each IF. UNC EE)IPES,UNC CAPS <br /> stakeholder group regarding policies,procedures,and G.Sobering Services <br /> practices chat would best facilitate community-wide H,HofnelesslScreet Outreach and Harm Reduction. <br /> collaboration around crisis response.Thisarkgroup also <br /> provided in put to the Faci lity Design Worlgroup. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Tony Marimpietri said they convened two workgroups. He said that the stakeholder <br /> 5 group's purpose was to try to engage all that are likely to have an operational relationship with <br /> 6 the facility and the staff. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Slide #6 <br /> DESIGN UPDATE:WORKGROU P OUTPUTAIND► FOLLOW LIP <br /> ■ Purp*ss.Translate the servloes recommended In oueApr!I • Fallow-up.7he oucputfrom this workgroup will be used <br /> 2021 report into a descrkpclon of the physical Payout of the when working with the architect firm to be selected to <br /> Faculty and its special infrastructure need's and to clarify develop a preliminary design and cost estl'matm, <br /> regurawy rwrim rift, Contents of Desi nWorkc u <br /> I''O p repor#:. <br /> • ha.Subcommittee facilitated about 4 wor-kgroup A. Front EntrancvWaicingAreas. <br /> meetings and engaged approximately IB SKEs who Kaye B, Rear Entrance. <br /> expertise In cidsls facility regulation and design.Draw on C, BHUC Clinical Areas. <br /> experience from other similar facilities. <br /> D. Adult FBC Areas, <br /> ■ Focus.Discussion centered on key elements of the Faculty E, Medical Areas. <br /> and the quality of user experience where users ranged from F Facia Icy Security, <br /> EMS.L couresidecendon center,general public with special <br /> G. Outpatient Service Areas. <br /> attention to the needs of specific patlem cohorts(e g., <br /> adults,children,special needs. H. General Purpose Areas. <br /> • I, CommunlCy Partner t]'ffloes,V*rkspace. <br /> Results.Created a description of the physical layout of the <br /> Communications InfrasCructure, <br /> Facility.special Infrastructure componenmand regulatory J. <br /> requirements. <br /> 9 <br />