Orange County NC Website
20 <br /> tweaked as necessary to accommodate the roads. He said the Headwaters preserve is a <br /> headwaters for three different sub-basins, and to get sewer to this area would require having <br /> sewer services flow in three different directions. He said when sewer was installed in the <br /> Rogers Road community some extensions were made out to this area. <br /> Commissioner Fowler asked for a cost to develop water and sewer. <br /> Craig Benedict said he could not say that right now, but there are options from where it <br /> could come. He said the school site has two stub outs to the property. He said the Rogers <br /> Road sewer project extended sewer past the animal shelter and up to the Nunn property. He <br /> said the northern part of the site and the eastern area near the tracks would be served to the <br /> north at that time. He said as next steps are examined in a master plan, costs for infrastructure <br /> would be established. He said the Rogers Road sewer project was a joint effort between <br /> jurisdictions, and he hopes any future sewer work would be accomplished similarly. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> John Dempsey said the Greene Tract Forest is a 164-acre parcel of publically owned <br /> land. He said elected officials are being asked to transfer much publically owned land for <br /> eventual private development. He referred to proposal 6A, noting this proposal targets 66 acres <br /> for unspecified mixed use and commercial development. He said acreage could vary up to <br /> 15% for a total of 76 acres, and 21 acres along the eastern side of the Greene tract will remain <br /> as public owned and undeveloped land in the short term, but may be evaluated for development <br /> in the future depending on needs at that time. He said that brings the total of public land being <br /> developed to 97 acres, over 59% of the property. He said 16 acres are designated for public <br /> schools and recreation site, equaling a total of 113 acres out of 164-acre tract that is being <br /> targeted for development. He said there is no affordable housing mandated by the joint <br /> resolution, but it includes a goal of affordable and mixed income opportunities. He said the <br /> Board and town councils should vote no and direct planning staff to work on a plan that is more <br /> in line with the Rogers Road: Mapping Our Community's Future report from May of 2016. He <br /> believes doing so would garner more public support. <br /> Nancy Oates said she is a long-time advocate for affordable housing. She said voting <br /> on this resolution is problematic because the public still does not know the ramifications of <br /> switching the boundaries around. She said she does not see any reason to rush. She said <br /> there was tremendous public turnout at the in person and online meetings, but their questions <br /> still have not been answered. She said 50 years ago elected officials dealt duplicitously with <br /> the residents of Rogers Road, promising a recreation area, but instead the landfill was <br /> expanded, tainting the local wells, and she has a sick feeling this duplicitousness is happening <br /> again. She said residents of Rogers Road voices have been clear they do not want "stack them <br /> and pack them" housing, but that is what mixed use for all income levels is. She said she did <br /> not get support from colleagues when she suggested removing mixed use high rises from <br /> allowable uses in 2016. She said in talking with them later, they said the plan was to sell off the <br /> land to private developers to pay for the infrastructure and would get more money with mixed <br /> use developments. She said the land could be donated to a nonprofit, and if that is the Board's <br /> intent, it should be spelled out in the resolution tonight. She said potential traffic impacts have <br /> not been explored. She said in 2019, then school board chair Joal Broun said the land was too <br /> small for a school and wanted to discuss preserving other land in Chapel Hill for a school site. <br /> She said the smallest school that would fit on this site is an elementary school, only if it took up <br /> all of the recreation space. She said the Chapel Hill Town Council is leaning on the three newly <br /> elected officials to support this and be a team player. She said the environmental report states <br /> clearly that no infrastructure is to be laid on top of the protected areas, but maps show that this <br /> will indeed happen. <br />