Browse
Search
Abstract for Assembly of Governments Meeting Discussion Items
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2022
>
Agenda - 01-25-2022 Virutal Assembly of Governments Meeting
>
Abstract for Assembly of Governments Meeting Discussion Items
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2022 10:55:46 AM
Creation date
1/20/2022 10:54:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/25/2022
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Agenda for January 25, 2022 Assembly of Governments Virtual Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2022\Agenda - 01-25-2022 Virutal Assembly of Governments Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> • Prioritization Survey (REI) <br /> Each strategy is assigned a "net promoter score" specifically among survey respondents <br /> of color or historically marginalized communities.Note: we could not assess initiatives <br /> for this element of the framework because of the structure of the survey data we collected <br /> (I.e., we did not gather input on specific strategies this early in the planning process). <br /> o Connection to Racial Equity: This part of the assessment pulls out data from <br /> communities of color to further elevate and weight the responses we received <br /> from those populations within the survey results to ensure their opinions (though a <br /> minority of the responses) were given more weight. <br /> • REI Combined Input <br /> Each initiative receives a score of 1 for each priority it addresses.Initiative scores are <br /> averaged together to determine the score for the corresponding strategy. Priorities in this <br /> list were informed exclusively from conversations with communities of color-these <br /> needs reflect trends we heard from engagement with those groups during town hall <br /> meetings and focus groups. <br /> o Connection to Racial Equity: Scoring in this part of the assessment is informed <br /> solely by input from communities of color that we engaged with during the <br /> planning process to elevate the concerns and needs of those communities by <br /> awarding additional points to each strategy based on its ability to address these <br /> needs. <br /> • Transformative Change <br /> This piece of the prioritization framework is based on a popular resilience framework that <br /> is intended to assess each initiative based on its ability to contribute to enhanced <br /> resilience. Each initiative receives a score of 1 for each consideration that it addresses. <br /> o Connection to Racial Equity: The framework references elements of social <br /> resilience that touch on racial equity and inclusion(e.g., community cohesion). <br /> (2) Strategy scores specific to feedback from communities of color were weighted again,using a <br /> multiplier that corresponds to the disproportionate rates of infection, death, and hospitalization <br /> from COVID-19 among historically marginalized communities. There are 9 metrics the team <br /> considered here, and the multiplier is the average of all 9 factors). (See the weighting in the <br /> image below). <br /> rire tr;drtpato ame #� ran H <br /> Whll,-,Hon-Hispania Native,Non-Hispankc HL"nkc American,Non-Hispanlc Latinarsns persons pew persons persons <br /> Cases 1.3x <br /> "Dspiraliratkon ?.Ux a:�x 31x <br /> DeaW I, LOX 1.9x 2.3x <br /> A�Warall multlp4ws.le <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.