Browse
Search
PRC agenda 12012021
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Parks and Recreation Council
>
Agendas
>
2021
>
PRC agenda 12012021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2021 4:00:14 PM
Creation date
12/1/2021 4:00:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
PRC meeting summary 12012021
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Parks and Recreation Council\Minutes\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Meeting Summary—Parks and Recreation Council November 3,2021 <br /> Virtual Meeting Zoom <br /> Members Present: John Greeson(Chair),Xilong Zhao(Vice-Chair), Chris Colvin,Natalie <br /> Ziemba,Mikki Fleming, Cecily Kritz,Robert"Bob" Smith,Tim Tippin,Andrew Landstrom, <br /> Gina Reyman,Haywood Rhodes <br /> Members Absent: Greg Hughes <br /> Staff: David Stancil,Beth Young,Kalani Allen <br /> Alice Armstrong, Chapel Hill Parks and Greenways and Recreation Commission liaison <br /> Chair John Greeson called meeting to order at 6:31pm. <br /> Report of the Chair/Review of Meeting Notes,Additions to Agenda: In lieu of roll call, Chair <br /> John Greeson had members and staff introduce themselves to newly appointed member Natalie <br /> Ziemba. Chair Greeson asked for any changes to the last meeting summary notes. There were no <br /> objections to approving the last meeting note summary with no changes,which was then <br /> approved by all members. <br /> New business: <br /> a. PRC Member Survey-A survey was created for the council to participate in to gauge <br /> how the board is operating and find the interests of members. Director David Stancil <br /> gave an overview of why the survey was created and when it would be sent. <br /> b. New Liaison to Intergovernmental Parks Work Group (IPWG)-Stancil shared that <br /> member Cecily Kritz will be moving next month. Her position will be vacant until <br /> February, as the BOCC cycle for new appointments has already completed and will <br /> occur later this month. Kritz has been the IPWG's PRC representative. Stancil reviewed <br /> the groups that comprise the IPWG and explained the primary focus of the IPWG. Chair <br /> Greeson opened the discussion to see if a member would like to be the new liaison. He <br /> offered to postpone the decision to appoint someone until the December meeting, in <br /> order to give members time to decide if they wish to be the representative. Member Chris <br /> Colvin expressed his interest in the position. He also agreed to move this item to the <br /> December meeting agenda,to allow members not present a chance to express interest. <br /> Chair Greeson asked for any objections to this. With no objections,the council agreed <br /> unanimously to move this item to the December meeting agenda. <br /> Old Business: <br /> a. Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2030—Staff Priorities- Stancil solicited DEAPR <br /> staff to provide their rankings on priority for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2030. <br /> Stancil showed a document with staff priorities on a scale from most important to least <br /> important. The recommendations range from protecting open spaces to identifying <br /> residents'needs. Tim Tippin added that his township of Bingham has a potential park <br /> planned and asked about other potential lands for future parks. Stancil provided a <br /> summary of lands the county has acquired. Tippin suggested a formal survey of residents <br /> may be conducted for potential feedback. Stancil reiterated that a survey was discussed <br /> for Bingham residents in past years,and perhaps it can be added to the new work plan <br /> for next year. Gina Reyman added that it is possible the cities could pay for recreation <br /> facilities to help with providing recreation spaces for residents. Stancil explained that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.