Browse
Search
APB meeting summary 09152021
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Agricultural Preservation Board
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
APB meeting summary 09152021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2021 1:57:57 PM
Creation date
11/18/2021 1:56:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/15/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
APB Agenda 09152021
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Agricultural Preservation Board\Agendas\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z <br /> a high value on local or quality.They might casually assume it is local but it's not and they really <br /> don't know where it comes from. How will this work if milk comes from across the country, in <br /> regions where water is becoming scarce?There is some demand for the Aubervice (sp) service,that <br /> delivers milk to your door. So are there consumers out there who will value local milk and will be <br /> willing to pay a premium? For example, Maple View sold a lot of milk locally, so there must have <br /> been enough demand although maybe not extremely profitable. Dairying is lifestyle that limits the <br /> farmer's freedom to have a vacation or take time out, so there could be a generational factor here <br /> too, in that fewer people are willing to commit to that type of schedule. Maybe there is a model for <br /> two families running a farm? McKnight thinks we need to do a preliminary feasibility study to get <br /> some idea of what the market might be—is there money for that?Also,there should be some <br /> educational campaign to help consumers understand the issues here,that explains the benefits of <br /> local milk in the context of the larger issues of today.As an aside, Ortosky noted that he now works <br /> within the Extension Service and now has more access to the resources of NCSU,which might help. <br /> Our existing economic develop grant program directs those funds to producers.There should be <br /> other sources. Our challenge is to articulate our idea and our project,then that can be used to get <br /> funding for a specific project with tangible outcomes. For a market analysis, the real question still <br /> seems to be about the demand—is there demand for local milk, or is the demand more for the value <br /> added pieces, like cheese?We need to really understand what consumers want in order to help <br /> shape the direction for future dairying activity.This could be a task for the subcommittee, to <br /> develop a purpose and scope statement, perhaps partnering with nearby counties, like Durham. If <br /> there is a market anywhere in NC, it will be in Orange and Durham counties. If specialty/local dairy <br /> won't work here, it won't work anywhere in the state. We need an in-depth demand analysis for this <br /> area. Who are these consumers and what will they buy/how much will they pay? NCSU and <br /> Extension seem to be the best bet for assistance in this effort. We all recall when dairying was much <br /> more present here, so one question is: what happened? Why have they all disappeared? Redding <br /> noted that all this sounds compelling enough to merit having the subcommittee continue to pursue <br /> this topic. McKnight will continue to discuss and bring updated thinking back to the subcommittee. <br /> b) Ag Trust Fund Proposal: Staff reviewed past discussion about the proposed approach and how it <br /> evolved within the Food Council, including the candid feedback that was received from the County <br /> Manager.That concept was going to go through the equity evaluation process but we haven't heard <br /> the outcome of that.The general guidance we received then was that we needed to repackage this <br /> concept as a dedicated, stand-alone funding on a recurring basis,to get it proposed as a <br /> departmental line item and then keep doing advocacy with the BOCC to promote the idea. Staff <br /> thinks this winter is a good time to discuss this topic with department leadership to get advice and <br /> guidance on how to pursue the idea.This can be framed as a very ag-specific program that partners <br /> with the Lands Legacy program but does not compete with it. <br /> 6. Informational Items/Future Agenda Items: <br /> a. Ordinance Revision: Staff participated in the state information session earlier today, going through <br /> the ordinance line by line to learn how the changes to the state legislation need to be implemented <br /> in local ordinances. Most changes were just clarifications and technical updates and nothing major. <br /> Staff will make the proposed changes then present a marked-up version of our ordinance to the APB <br /> at the next meeting. Staff can share this with any members who are interested. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.