Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-11-2001-9g
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 12-11-2001
>
Agenda - 12-11-2001-9g
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 9:56:07 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:36:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/11/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9g
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20011211
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
RES-2001-119 Resolution approving Fox Hill Farm Central Preliminary Plat
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fox Hill Farm Central-Prellminarv Plen <br />TM1e BCaM COnsitleretlapreliminary plan for FOx Hill Fartn Cenral. Craig <br />BenedlG made tM115 pR3entatlOn, I(I6a VJnaeNBGOe GUSIEf pdn and is OCated <br />between Baltlwin ROatl and New SM1aron CM1urdr RCatl In Eno TOwnsM1lp. There are 8l <br />lots in the plan The total acreage is 3W.43 eves antl Ne entire Subtlivision Is locatetl <br />In the Neuse RNer Basin. The average lot size Iz 337 acres antl there is 33%open <br />space, which is aver 100 acres. There is some mmmbn area open space that will be <br />tletlicatetl to Oe homeownelsasspciation. TM1ere is someintermnnectlviry beck into <br />Hillsborough Mrough Ne subtlivision. Th0re are twn primary issues wiN the <br />administretion rcmmmentlation. Ona Is that this prolaG will ba developed In phazes. <br />Phase one is only 101ots. TM1e fitlminisVedbn suggesb Nat within phase two, Ne <br />'mtermnnedivity t0 Bamwin Road be provided. Tha developer has agreed m adtl Nis <br />setlion of Fax HIII Fertn Drive. The Second eugge3tiw is Mat at Ne Intersection of New <br />Sharon Church Roatl antl Fox Hill Farm Drive, that a northbound left Wm lane be <br />'msWlled. A ttaffc sWtly was done by Igmley-HOm antl Asemlafes antl h wds fountl that <br />the level of service for New SM1amn CM1UroJt Road woultl no[ pmmp[Me neUSSM1y lOr a <br />IeH mm lane. The staff thinks Nat, based on Ne siu of this development and Ne <br />proximity of Ne dreinage way, Me sight visibility woultl be wmpromised on New Sharon <br />LM1UrcM1 Roatl. An additional recommendation was to atltl fin access roatl into the phase <br />four area while phase ASO is undemay for fire mntrol. The staff remmmend3 approval <br />Of Na aUhtllVlfilOn WIVI gle3¢ LOndltoa3. <br />Dawn Herd<k, Planhing Diredorfor John R. McAdams Company, was <br />representing Rantly Fax, Ne developer. She tnanke0 the emtl IBr all IN Ne hartl work <br />done on this process. She saitl that they were somewhat cencemetl when they <br />tllsWVeretl the additional COmm¢nts from the stall antl ware ueeble to diPILSS tFese <br />RCOmm¢bddllobs. TIIBy ag100 wlVl Ne RcommeneatlOn Of hl¢ IBf1 Wm lane a1M tM1e fire <br />safely Issue. She saitl Nat the atltlition of Ne mnnecror in phase [wp wmultl be a <br />substantial axpentliWre of tlevelopntaM funds be®use Here are two stream crossings. <br />They are also wncemetl about the access m Ne pon0 in phase two because (here i3 <br />some farming operation In that fires. They went m make sure Mat Ne operation IS not <br />impaired by cpnatmtling Ne road TM1ay are also cpncamed about the new <br />requirements for the lantlscape buffers. They wantmuMersGnd what needs to be <br />done to be In compliance wiN the County's regulation. What is lndutle0 in the staff <br />report Is not vfiet Ney ware mid originally m eo in Nelr lanescape plan. They woum like <br />m know what Ne new mquirements mean far Fax Hill Fartn Central. <br />One of Ms. Hemck's colleagues got up [c speak but I did not get his <br />name. He pointedou[Nat Nere waultl only be 331ot6 in phase N.o, wTicM1 is wM1en tM <br />atltlitional mnneGOr roatl is being 5u99astetl. The Oaveloperwould preferlowfiit late <br />in the project m provide this connector, suN as in phase Nree. <br />Domm1551War JaCObs made raferanCO m 60114 Wa3ta c0¢Cllon 8hd a3ked II <br />Ne tleveloperwould consider wodc'm9 wiN Ne Planning and Solid WaAe sbHto <br />possibly locate one or Wro recycling colledien points. Dawn Herrick said Nat Ne <br />developer would probably be happy IB talk m the Lbunry about Nis possibility <br />Commissioner Jambs asked same clarifying puestlms, wMCh were <br />answ0retl by Creig Beneeict. <br />Commissicner Jambs saitl that M1e was glatl to see Ne recommentladon fw <br />Ne tum lane because DOT's standaNS are not nece6serily me "be all antl eM ell' He <br />asketl why Nere is not a right tum taper at Baldwin Road Cmig Senedld Sa10 that Ne <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.