Browse
Search
Agenda 11-16-2021; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Agenda - 11-16-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda 11-16-2021; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/11/2021 4:55:58 PM
Creation date
11/12/2021 2:46:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/16/2021
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-16-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br /> 1 average increase among that group was $158, equaling $218,000 in estimated exposure. He <br /> 2 said he feels less confident that this cohort represents income distribution of the entire county, <br /> 3 but this was the best estimation staff could measure to determine if the allocated $250,000 <br /> 4 would be sufficient. <br /> 5 Commissioner McKee said this would mean $218,000 per year escalating and ongoing. <br /> 6 He said every time there is a revaluation in Orange County values will increase, minus a <br /> 7 catastrophic event. He said even if values do not go up, the county can expect $200,000 plus in <br /> 8 ongoing costs for this program. He said this will be paid with ARPA money this year, and asked <br /> 9 if this will have to come from county funds going forward. <br /> 10 Travis Myren said it will be a board policy decision of how to fund the program in future <br /> 11 years. <br /> 12 Commissioner McKee said it would likely be funded through other sources. He said he <br /> 13 owns and runs a farm, and benefit from a lower tax rate due to him farming the land. He said if <br /> 14 he sells the land, the money has to be paid back. He asked if the homeowner passes away and <br /> 15 house is sold, is there a clawback provision on this tax advantage. He asked if the home is <br /> 16 handed down to the next generation of family, will this be a generational subsidy to the family <br /> 17 over time. He said the original proposal did not have an age limit, but asked if the Jackson <br /> 18 Center age limit was 65. <br /> 19 Travis Myren said the age limit for that program is 62. <br /> 20 Chair Price said this program would not decrease the value of the property, so it is <br /> 21 dependent on the homeowner, and the next generation will be liable for the value of the home. <br /> 22 Commissioner McKee said he understands. He said there is a subsidy to the taxes paid, <br /> 23 and he gets an advantage of paying a lower tax rate on his farm, for which he would required to <br /> 24 repay should he sell the land. <br /> 25 Chair Price said Commissioner McKee's benefit is due to the use of his land, as <br /> 26 opposed to his income. <br /> 27 Commissioner McKee said he is asking these questions because he does not believe <br /> 28 this program will stop, nor should it, once started due to the gentrification seen across the <br /> 29 county. He said he wants to think about the long-term implications of the program. <br /> 30 Chair Price said she wants to hear from George Barrett on the Jackson Center's <br /> 31 program. <br /> 32 Commissioner Greene said the Jackson Center uses age 62, but it is flexible based on a <br /> 33 formula that they use. She said she understands why Chair Price wants to decrease the age to <br /> 34 at least 50, and she has gone back and forth herself. She said Commissioner Richards has <br /> 35 brought up a good question about the basic purpose of the program. She is on the side of <br /> 36 getting rid of age limit in favor of preserving community. She said Commissioner McKee has <br /> 37 brought up some good questions about the sustainability of the program and she wonders if <br /> 38 there should be a clawback provision. She said if someone is going to buy a property at a <br /> 39 gentrified inflated price, why not have a provision where the county would get maybe three <br /> 40 years of the tax back, and let the buyer and seller work it out about who pays. <br /> 41 Chair Price said her original intent was to help preserve the neighborhood, and perhaps <br /> 42 with an extra push for seniors who may have lived there for half a century. <br /> 43 George Barrett said there is no age limit in the Jackson Center property tax program. He <br /> 44 said age is taken into account and is used it to weigh the award amount. He said the <br /> 45 community did not want to include age limit when creating the program, because there are <br /> 46 people across age groups dealing with these issues. <br /> 47 Commissioner Richards said the issue of heir's property came up while she was looking <br /> 48 into this program. She said the idea of a clawback is something that might be included if the <br /> 49 home in sold to developer or investor, instead of being passed down to an heir if concern if <br /> 50 neighborhood preservation is the goal. She said this is a way to sustain the program once <br /> 51 ARPA money is gone. She said part of concern with age is if there is a 25 year old that inherits <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.