Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 8/9/2021 <br /> 1 Leon Meyers: Asked the Board if there questions for Dr. Daniel. There were none. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Andrew Petesch: Provided his closing statement in providing standing for Ms. Arter. That the determination is unlawful <br /> 4 and the buffer should apply. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Leon Meyers: Asked for a motion regarding Ms. Arter's standing <br /> 7 <br /> 8 MOTION made by Nathan to find that Alison Arter has standing for this case <br /> 9 VOTE: Seconded by Beth Bronson <br /> 10 UNANIMOUS <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Leon Meyers: Asked Mr. Hornik on standing <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Robert Hornik: Submitted Hornik 1 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Andrew Petesch: Objected to the 2 affidavits that have been submitted. Not related to standing or this case and should <br /> 17 be submitted as variance. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Michael Harvey: Stated the document submitted would be labeled Hornik 1 <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Robert Hornik: Stated the Burt's own the property about which the buffer and the appeal about the buffer is related. <br /> 22 Referenced specifics of 160D-1402C. Reiterated that the Burt's own the property. Based on the statue they have <br /> 23 standing. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Andrew Petesch: Stated the applicant will stipulate to the Burt's standing and asked for evidentiary showing their <br /> 26 relation the Bakst. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Beth Bronson: Asked to clarify that the Burt's have submitted an affidavit <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Robert Hornik: Stated that the Burt's did not submit an affidavit. We have Ms. Bakst affidavit she is involved in the <br /> 31 development as well as Mr. Koch's affidavit. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Leon Meyers: Asked the standing question is the Burt's standing for the hearing. There were no additional questions <br /> 34 from the board. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Leon Meyers: Asked for a motion regarding the Burt's standing <br /> 37 <br /> 38 MOTION made by Beth to find that the Burt's have standing for this case <br /> 39 VOTE: Seconded by Jeff Scott <br /> 40 UNANIMOUS <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Leon Meyers: Asked if there were anything else with respect to standing for this hearing. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Michael Harvey: Provided a description of the case as follows. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 CASE A-1-21: APPEAL/ INTERPREATION of the decision of the Orange County Zoning Officer <br /> 47 APPEAL/INTERPRETATION application from the determination of the Zoning Officer as articulated in <br /> 48 an April 12, 2021 letter (Attachment(s) 1 and 3). <br /> 49 <br /> 9 <br />