Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 8/9/2021 <br /> 1 Andrew Petesch: Entered referenced document into the record as Applicants Exhibit 5. Asks Ms. Arter is she has any <br /> 2 marketing materials received related to this property. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Alison Arter: Stated she did have the marketing materials for the property. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Andrew Petesch: Asked Ms. Arter is the document was an accurate copy of one of those. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Robert Hornik: Stated that was irrelevant <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Andrew Petesch: Is trying to establish relevance that this was purchased as a horse farm and that this is the nature of <br /> 11 this property and if this buffer is not applied then there are adverse effects to the property and the horses. All of this <br /> 12 goes directly to standing. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Leon Meyers: Asked for Mr. Petesch to please proceed. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Andrew Petesch: Proceeded with asking Ms. Arter questions about the document. The document is entered into the <br /> 17 record as Applicant Exhibit 6. He asked specifics regarding how the property was marketed and if it was marketed as <br /> 18 specifically as a horse property. With Ms. After reading the document specifics. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Alison Arter: stated that she hoped the board sees how important this buffer would be and that horses are delicate <br /> 21 animals and this would be very stressful for them to have the road to close and it would have a negative impact on her <br /> 22 property. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Leon Meyers: Asked Mr. Petesch if there was anything more on standing <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Andrew Petesch: Asked if the board would prefer to allow cross immediately now from Mr. Hornik. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Leon Meyers: Asked Mr. Hornik if he had any questions for Ms. Arter. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Robert Hornik: Asked where it states being marked as a horse farm on Exhibit 6. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Alison Arter: Stated that the property is classified as a farm for tax purposes so that doesn't make it a farm? <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Robert Hornik: Responded that it wouldn't necessarily. Goes on to state that she applied for tax relief in which Ms. Arter <br /> 35 responded that it was for sales tax only. Asks about her testimony regarding noises not being good for horses and <br /> 36 Electric cars not being good for horses. Ms. Arter responded that neither would be good for horses. Asked how many <br /> 37 clients she had boarding their horses on her property. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Alison Arter: Responded that she had no clients boarding right now. She goes on to state that she didn't want to invite <br /> 40 people to board their horses knowing that there would be construction so close to the property. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Robert Hornik: Asked Ms. Arter about boarding prior to the date when Ms. Batts came and spoke of construction there <br /> 43 and when was the last time she boarded horses on the property. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Alison Arter: Answered in the middle of 2017 there were 4. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 James Bryan: Stated the audio isn't picking up and that social distance would need to be practiced. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Robert Hornik: Proceeded to ask details about Ms. After's history of boarding horses on the property in 2017. <br /> 50 <br /> 5 <br />