Orange County Approved Signed BOA Minutes 21 07 12

Browse Search

Approved 8/9/2021 1 Andrew Petesch: Asked if this was the site plan that she saw. 2 3 Alsion Arter: Stated she had seen a number of iterations and was uncertain if this was the one that was final plan. 4 5 Andrew Petesch: Asked if the road location on the site plan would infringe on the 30 foot buffer. Ms. Arter stated yes. 6 7 Andrew Petesch: Entered Applicant Exhibit 4. Asked Ms. After some of the concerns and adverse impacts of not 8 including a buffer and not setting back this road from your property line. 9 10 Alison Arter: Stated she was told that it was to be a gravel road and she would have to expect a lot of dust. She 11 describes the winds and how the dust will settle on her property, how fast cars will travel on the road and its impacts on 12 horses. Describes the amount of traffic she will have as to how many cars will travel on the road. Expressed concerns 13 over the light pollution and noise pollution from cars. Explains how important the buffer would be to her. Stated she is 14 worried about the potential for trespass. 15 16 Andrew Petesch: Asked the lack of having the vegetative screen will allow people to see into the property. Ms. Arter 17 said yes. 18 19 Robert Hornik: Objected stating that it is speculative. 20 21 Leon Meyers: Reminded Mr. Petesch that this portion of the hearing where standing is being established and asks if 22 there was more testimony regarding standing. 23 24 Andrew Petesch: Stated he understands this is a long process and that he is under duty by law to enter his testimony 25 evidence into the record and this is his opportunity. Standing is something that can be raised at any time on appeal and 26 if he doesn't enter the evidence before this board and it gets challenges before the courts or the superior court of 27 appeals then I will not have an opportunity to put additional evidence into the record. I am obligated to do this on behalf 28 of my client. 29 30 Leon Meyers: Stated that Mr. Hornik looked like he has something to say. 31 32 Robert Hornik: Stated that he did 33 34 James Bryan: Asked if the parties could social distance 35 36 Leon Meyers: Asked Mr. Hornik to identify himself. He did such by stating his name was Robert Hornik and the attorney 37 for Steve and Sharon Burt who own development property. 38 39 Robert Hornik: Stated that the testimony standing is going beyond determining standing. 40 41 Leon Meyers: Stated for Mr. Petesch to proceed. 42 43 Andrew Petesch: Agreed and noted that all of this testimony is specifically related to standing. Ask about a document 44 which is a schematic of a property trail on her property along the property line. Asks more details about the document 45 referenced 46 47 Alison Arter:: Described details of the document and about changes she is making in order move the trail to make it 48 entirely on her property. 49 4