Orange County Approved BOA Minutes 20 12 14

Browse Search

Approved 0810912021 1 Chair Meyers indicated the Weidner's were found to have standing on Case A-4-20. 2 3 Chair Meyers asked if there was a Bradley Dent in the meeting room. Mr. Dent identified himself and approached the 4 podium. Ms. Cheek swore in Mr. Dent. 5 6 Mr. Dent indicated he was a resident of 2600 Old Greensboro Highway near the proposed cricket field. Chair Meyers 7 summarized the cadence of tonight's meeting. Mr. Dent indicated he was here to document for the Board where his 8 property was and discuss his concerns over potential impacts to his well. 9 10 Mr. Dent indicated his parcel was approximately 100 ft. west of Mr. Patil's property with access off Old Greensboro 11 Road. Mr. Dent showed his parcel on a map. 12 13 Mr. Dent indicated his concern was over the parking lot, which is closer than 700 ft. from his property as denoted on the 14 survey contained within the application. Mr. Dent indicated he is concerned over runoff impacting his existing shallow 15 well, specifically from oils/leaking fuel impacting his well. The proposed overflow, grass, parking area is very close to 16 his property and shallow well. Mr. Dent indicated he had no issues with the use of the property for cricket, and was not 17 there to argue against the development of cricket fields on the property, but wanted the opportunity to express the 18 concern the proposed overflow grass parking location does represent a concern due to potential environmental impacts 19 to the existing well. Mr. Dent also believes the survey submitted by Mr. Patil improperly denotes the distance of the 20 overflow parking area from his well and should be corrected. Mr. Dent did indicate he was somewhat concerned about 21 lights from vehicles shining into his house, but was more concerned over potential well impacts. 22 23 Chair Meyers thanked Mr. Dent and asked if there were any questions. There were general clarifying questions about 24 the distance of the residence. 25 26 Mr. Scott asked Mr. Harvey if there were regulations governing the development of overflow parking. Mr. Harvey 27 indicated that as the parking was not required, the UDO did not give him authority to compel the parking to be improved 28 in any way. Mr. Harvey suggested the Board could have a conversation with the applicant over this concern at an 29 appropriate time. Mr. Qandil asked if the State were going to be required to review this project or if the UDO required 30 an environmental impact review of the proposed cricket field. Mr. Harvey indicated there would not be sufficient land 31 disturbing activity to require an environmental assessment as detailed in Section 6.16 of the UDO and that the State did 32 not have jurisdiction over the development proposal. The applicant will have to comply with applicable Erosion Control 33 and Stormwater permitting requirements based on proposed land disturbance. Mr. Harvey reminded the Board this was 34 not only a requirement of the UDO, but was also an applicant recommended condition of approval. 35 36 MOTION made by Vice-chair Halkiotis finding that Mr. Dent was the owner of property near the proposed recreation 37 facility and had standing to comment on the special use permit, seconded by Mr. Qandil. 38 VOTE: Unanimous. 39 40 Chair Meyers asked if anyone else was requesting a determination on standing. There were none. 41 42 Chair Meyers asked for a motion to adjourn Case A-4-20 to the January 11, 2021 regular meeting. 43 44 MOTION made by Vice-chair Halkiotis adjourning the public hearing for Case A-4-20 to January 11, 2021 in order to 45 conduct the evidentiary component of the hearing, seconded by Mr. Scott. 46 VOTE: Unanimous. 47 48 Chair Meyers asked if there was any other business before the Board. There was none. Chair Meyers summarized 49 work being completed by Mr. Bryan updating and revising the Board's rules of procedure. Mr. Bryan indicating this 50 would be addressed at future meetings and that the update would incorporate anticipated changes in State law 10