Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
4 <br /> Slide #6 <br /> Stakeholder Response <br /> There is anapport-icy for success <br /> r r <br /> LD <br /> Expensive Slow Process <br /> ❑—lopers cite fees as Developers recognize a Any delay is due to <br /> casts Incorporated Into market and have ahlllty, requlrernents for public <br /> housing prices but require public rneetings ratherthanto <br /> funding- stalling levels <br /> fi <br /> Slide #7 <br /> Five Recommendations <br /> M zD $ .ram <br /> Amend)PA& -SCrea line Upd ate the Pia ns Additional Bonds Expardllenslty <br /> WSMPBA Subdlvlslms Bonus <br /> Q r 1 <br /> Allow an exception for 1'1-1 idate the pmaas Acknowledge what has Funds are critical to The idea of a density <br /> Affordable Housl ng � sa that It Is clear, and has not worked, dchleving substanWl bonus stlll has nserlt, <br /> within the Rural BuKer .,n,e andamain/ particularly the current impacts but perhaps a greater <br /> f <br /> density bonus distinction is needed <br /> Slide #8 <br /> Specific Strategies <br /> Changes to the U UO <br /> Subdivisions Density Bonus <br /> - Exempt, Minor& • Never used since <br /> Ma'or with 1991. <br /> i mu�tiple <br /> subcateeorles • Likely not <br /> - distinctions disparate enough <br /> Without a of a bonus <br /> difference • Would need <br /> - Cumbersome and NCGAto increase <br /> confusing incentive. <br /> a <br />