Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-24-2003-c3b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 11-24-2003
>
Agenda - 11-24-2003-c3b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2008 11:31:33 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:36:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c3b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20031124
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ordinance to Public Hearing 13 <br />November 24, 2003 ~ !1 <br />inspection of tower foundations, structures, <br />guys, and connections for evidence of <br />settlement or later movement; soil erosion; <br />condition of paint or galvanizing; rust or <br />corrosion, loose or missing bolts, loose or <br />corroded lightning protection connectors; <br />tower plumbness, significant variation in guy <br />sags (i.e. tensions), and other material <br />areas or matters relating to the structural <br />integrity of the tower, This is considered a <br />minor inspectien review, <br />c) In addition to the regularly scheduled major <br />and minor inspections set forth in <br />paragraphs 1) and 2) above, a minor <br />inspection, at a minimum, will be conducted <br />if the tower or its appurtenances are noted <br />at any time to be visibly damaged. <br />Additionally, a major inspection shall be <br />conducted if the visible damage to the tower <br />is significant or when, after conducting a <br />minor inspection, significant questions <br />remain about the structural integrity of the <br />tower. <br />3) The Inspections Division may conduct periodic <br />inspections of telecommunications towers to ensure <br />electrical integrity. The owner of the <br />telecommunication tower may be required by the <br />County to have more frequent inspections should <br />there be reason to believe that the electrical <br />integrity of the tower is jeopardized. The County <br />reserves the right to require additional inspections if <br />there is evidence that the tower has a safety <br />problem or is exposed to extraordinary conditions, <br />4) Structurally Unsafe ar lJnused Towers, Any tower <br />found, through inspection by the owner or by <br />inspection of the Inspections Division, to be <br />structurally unsafe and cannot be brought into <br />compliance within 18Q days shall be removed at the <br />owner's expense, <br />5) Compliance with Standards. Current or former EIA <br />standards shall apply to the addition of antennas or <br />other appurtenances to communications towers <br />under the following conditions: <br />a) Additions to towers constructed prior to the <br />effective date of this Ordinance, regardless <br />of whether the additions are accounted for <br />G/curplanning/RoberUtetcotoiversroundtwo/tdcomm towers amendments Sec 6 sec 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.