Browse
Search
CFE Agenda 10112021
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Commission for the Environment
>
Agendas
>
2021
>
CFE Agenda 10112021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2021 3:45:48 PM
Creation date
10/7/2021 3:45:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/11/2021
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
CFE meeting notes 10112021
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Commission for the Environment\Minutes\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Fleet Carrboro proposed would be the least impactful to electrify since they are driven so <br /> City little each year. There were several unresolved questions about how these <br /> Schools vehicles would be used by staff and whether they were necessary. <br /> Further, a lack of charging infrastructure at the schools where these <br /> vehicles would be placed raises additional questions about whether they <br /> would be ready for use when needed for the proposed administrative <br /> travel. <br /> Two of the three proposed electric vehicles,the Tesla Model 3 and Ford <br /> Mustang Mach-E are expensive and impractical sports cars. The CFE <br /> reviewers questioned whether this choice of vehicle was an effective use <br /> of grant funds. <br /> The CFE liked the idea of using electric vehicles as teaching tools to <br /> make sustainable technologies more exciting and tangible. The idea of <br /> exposing a new generation of our community's leaders and thinkers to <br /> electric vehicles in our schools was well-supported by reviewers. <br /> Unfortunately,the lease arrangement for these vehicles makes it hard to <br /> believe that they would be useful teaching tools as they would not be able <br /> to be disassembled and reassembled by the students.Electric vehicles that <br /> students could simply view up close but not work on could likely be <br /> provided for free in other ways by parent volunteers or local non-profits. <br /> The CFE understands that this project proposal had to be written very <br /> quickly and is impressed by what the brand new CHCCS Sustainability <br /> Director was able to pull together in such a short time. <br /> For these reasons,the CFE recommends that the applicant address these <br /> concerns and for the project to be resubmitted in the next round. <br /> While expressing appreciation for the proposed project's focus on <br /> supporting additional biking and walking, CFE members gave this project <br /> a low ranking based on some widely held questions about the project <br /> design and the relatively high requested amount of funding. <br /> WayThe CFE's main question about this proposed project was whether the <br /> Imple ding Town of existence of wayfinding signage would convince residents to drive less, <br /> mplementat Chapel Hill particularly given that the hilly terrain poses an additional challenge to <br /> ion walking and biking. The CFE wondered if a less-expensive digital <br /> wayfinding map would be as effective and easier to update going forward. <br /> Based on an acknowledgement of the high capacity of the applicant, and <br /> the potential for an active transportation project to provide quick and <br /> long-lasting benefits when it has appropriate guidance from the <br /> community,the CFE encourages the applicant to update their proposal <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.