Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
4 <br /> Stakeholder Response <br /> There is an opportunity fur success <br /> Expensive Demand&Capacity Slow Process <br /> Developers cite fees as Developers recognize a Any delay is due to <br /> costs Ineerporated Into market and have ability, requirements forpubnlic. <br /> housing prices but require public meetings rather thato <br /> funding_ staffing levels <br /> fi <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Slide #7 <br /> Five Recommendations <br /> .r-:1 M $ :rte <br /> AmenddPA& -SfFieam®rfn- Updatethe Plans Additiona l Bonds Expand Density <br /> WSMPBA Sulbdlvlskans Bonus <br /> Alleve an exception for Consolidate the process Acknowledge what has Funds are critical to The Idea of a density <br /> Affordable Housing so that It Is clear, and has not worked, achleving substantlal bonus stlll has merit, <br /> within the Rum I Bul6er concise and c"in particularly the current impacts but perhaps a greater <br /> - _-- density bonus distinction is needed <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Slide #8 <br /> Specific Strategies <br /> Changes to the tl GO <br /> Subdivisions density Bonus <br /> • Exempt, Minor& • Neuer used since <br /> MaM`or with 1991. <br /> multiple <br /> subcategories • Likely not <br /> • Distinctions disparate enough <br /> without a of a bonus <br /> difference Would need <br /> • Cumbersome and IN CGA to increase <br /> confusing incentive. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br />