Orange County NC Website
98 <br /> l The Original Districting Plan for Electing North Carolina's Representatives to the U.S. House, <br /> 1991 (following the 1990 census) <br /> 5 <br /> 6 1 <br /> 11 12 4 <br /> 2 3 <br /> 9 <br /> 7 <br /> :F:< 2. The Second Districting Plan, 1992 <br /> 12 <br /> 5 <br /> 1 <br /> 11 6 4 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 9 3 <br /> 1 <br /> al districts and only the voters of each shaped districts(see Figure 1,page 11). the advice described earlier, commonly <br /> district vote for the seat representing This common advice came into ques- given for complying with Section 2 of the <br /> that area—single-member districts. By tion—and the creation of the oddly Voting Rights Act. <br /> creating districts with predominantly shaped districts slowed down dramati- That districting plan was submitted <br /> African-American populations,the court cally—when another North Carolina for preclearance,and the justice Depart- <br /> can give African-Americans a much bet- districting case came to the U.S.Supreme ment disapproved the plan. It would <br /> ter opportunity to elect candidates of Court in the mid-1990s.That case,Shaw have been possible,the justice Depart- <br /> their own choosing than they would have v.Reno,39 looked at the intersection of the ment said, to create two districts with <br /> with an at-large election system. requirements of Section 2 of the Voting African-American majorities, and the <br /> Because of the outcomes in these Rights Act and the Equal Protection failure to do was a violation of Section 2. <br /> cases,advice given to units of local gov- Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. So in 1992 the General Assembly <br /> ernment typically ran like this:If you can adopted a second plan,creating two dis- <br /> draw a district boundary for creating a What happened in the Shaw case? tricts with African-American majorities, <br /> district with an African-American ma- In 1991, following the national census districts 1 and 12, both with very odd <br /> jority, do so. Then draw the other dis- of 1990,the General Assembly drew the shapes (see Map 2).The justice Depart- <br /> tricts around that district to fit. If you districts for electing the state's twelve ment approved the new plan,but several <br /> can draw two districts with African- members of the U.S. House of Repre- white citizens sued, claiming that the <br /> American majorities, do so, and draw sentatives, creating 11 that had white General Assembly had made an uncon- <br /> the remaining districts to fit. Following majorities and 1, district 1,that had an stitutional use of race in drawing the <br /> this advice,cities,counties, and school African-American majority(see Map 1). lines.In Shaw v. Reno the U.S. Supreme <br /> systems sometimes came up with oddly In so doing,the legislature was applying Court held that the use of race in draw- <br /> I2 POPULAR GOVERNMENT SPRING 200I <br />