Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-05-2021; 6-a - Presentation of Final Report from the BOCC Elections Advisory Group (BEAG)
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2021
>
Agenda - 10-05-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 10-05-2021; 6-a - Presentation of Final Report from the BOCC Elections Advisory Group (BEAG)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2021 3:54:55 PM
Creation date
9/30/2021 3:25:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/5/2021
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-4
Document Relationships
Agenda for October 5, 2021 Board Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2021\Agenda - 10-05-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
65 <br /> 5 <br /> the County and is in need of reclamation. Group Co-Chair Hazirjian seconded the motion. <br /> Group Co-Chair Mulkey asked Mr. Wilder to call the names of Group members for voting <br /> purposes. Group members voted by roll call on the motion, and the motion was approved <br /> unanimously. <br /> Group Member Weiler commented that he knew he was in the minority, but he wanted to <br /> note that at-large seats can capture and reflect population growth and that seats should <br /> represent people, not land. <br /> Group Member Dancy stated that she agreed with Group Member Weiler and that she <br /> was supportive of a couple of at-large seats. <br /> Group Member Sykes noted that with single member districts, sometimes you do not find <br /> countywide solutions. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian stated she was most comfortable with single member districts <br /> and Group Member Bremer noted that single member districts were the easiest to <br /> understand. <br /> Group Member Catterall noted that while he was supportive of single member districts, at <br /> large seats did allow a person to vote for more than one person to represent them. <br /> Group Member Arab commented that she can understand the interest in at-large <br /> members, but seven districts will allow equal representation of their perspectives. <br /> Group Co-Chair Mulkey inquired with Group members regarding a motion. Group <br /> Member Jenkins made a motion that the Group recommend seven single member <br /> residency districts where candidates in the districts are voted on in both the primary and <br /> the general election by only the voters in the respective districts. Group Member Catterall <br /> seconded the motion. Group Co-Chair Mulkey asked Mr. Wilder to call the names of <br /> Group members for voting purposes. Group members voted by roll call on the motion, <br /> and the motion was approved by a vote of 12 to 1, with Group Member Dancy opposed. <br /> Group Member Dancy indicated that she agreed with the recommendation for seven <br /> seats, but that there is value in having some at-large seats. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian noted that seven single member districts would require <br /> redistricting, and motioned that the Group strongly recommend that the Board of <br /> Commissioners establish a multi-partisan/non-partisan independent advisory group and <br /> process to create the seven districts: <br /> • based the criteria outlined in the Group's Charge — Constitutional and statutory <br /> requirements and voting rights law; Proportionality, Equity, Uniformity, <br /> Simplicity/clarity, and Maximizing voter engagement <br /> • that seeks wherever possible to keep communities of interest together; and <br /> • that avoids splitting precincts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.