Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-05-2021; 6-a - Presentation of Final Report from the BOCC Elections Advisory Group (BEAG)
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2021
>
Agenda - 10-05-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 10-05-2021; 6-a - Presentation of Final Report from the BOCC Elections Advisory Group (BEAG)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2021 3:54:55 PM
Creation date
9/30/2021 3:25:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/5/2021
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-4
Document Relationships
Agenda for October 5, 2021 Board Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2021\Agenda - 10-05-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
159 <br /> 10) Do you have any additional thoughts you would like to share about <br /> election alternatives that would require legislative action by the NC <br /> General Assembly even if we do not pursue them at this time? <br /> DISTRICT 2 <br /> Martha Jenkins—Single member districts would likely be approved by the General Assembly. <br /> Patrick Mulkey—Stay away from legislative action required. I don't see any elected officials at any level <br /> wanting to carry this football. <br /> Alicia Reid—Yes...A current Republican Legislator and Democratic Governor will change in the future and <br /> there will be difference in decision making in every area of government. Additional parties <br /> could arise and the future is unknown. Having alternatives and continual open-minds to <br /> change (such as this Board)will make sure communities and government work together. <br /> Jenn Sykes—I'd love rank choice voting but in no world would the GA let that happen. I can get the <br /> studies on the voter satisfaction on that if you want them at some point, but not politically <br /> viable right now. <br /> DISTRICT 1 <br /> Kathy Arab—We need more than two districts, especially with the large number of transient voters in <br /> our county. Permanent residents need to have their voices heard more fairly. <br /> Jennifer Bremer—Nah. County commission redistricting is complicated enough as it is. I think the <br /> current legislation provides enough alternatives to select from. I personally feel <br /> avoiding engaging with the legislature would be a good idea,given that they can't be <br /> trusted not to apply their own lens, shall we say. <br /> Jaaz Catterall—Not at this time <br /> Lisa Hazirjian—Yes,thank you for asking! I'm deeply concerned about access to wealth—or lack thereof <br /> —being a huge factor in "electability" right now. Creating smaller districts should mitigate <br /> that somewhat by lowering the number of households one would want to reach with <br /> paid mailers, yard signs, etc (big ticket campaign expenses), but the best fix would be to <br /> take fundraising out of county elections entirely through public financing. <br /> Also, should we wind up with multi-member districts, I'd love to see a deeper look at <br /> ranked-choice voting as an alternative to the current system. For me as a voter, I'd much <br /> rather rank candidates in multiseat races than have to decide whether to use all my votes <br /> and potentially help my second choice candidate beat my first choice candidate (with <br /> two seats available) or to cast only one vote to give the best chances to my top choice <br /> candidate (which I have done). <br /> Krishna Mondal—No <br /> Jonathan Weiler—(No Comments Submitted) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.