Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
158 <br /> 9) Would a district format that resulted in voters in the unincorporated area <br /> south of Chapel Hill and Carrboro not being in the same district as voters <br /> within those towns be acceptable? <br /> DISTRICT 2 <br /> Martha Jenkins—Not sure—would have to see the whole map. <br /> Patrick Mulkey—Yes <br /> Alicia Reid—No <br /> Jenn Sykes—I don't see how in the world that can happen, but I can see them split between a CH and <br /> Carrboro district. <br /> DISTRICT 1 <br /> Kathy Arab—Yes <br /> Jennifer Bremer—No, I think it would be better to have that area be kept together with CH and <br /> Carrboro, especially as it seems likely to become more densely developed (although it <br /> occurs to me that it would have been useful to have a presentation from the town <br /> planners for CH-Carrboro and maybe Hillsborough. We can anticipate more residential <br /> development along the 1-40 corridor, I think. <br /> Jaaz Catterall—Potentially,yes, if necessary for population distribution purposes <br /> Lisa Hazirjian— Potentially; where would those folks wind up? <br /> Also, for lack of a better place to mention this, in drawing district lines for single-member <br /> districts, I would love to see the extremely affluent areas bundled together and the much <br /> more affordable areas bundled together. It feels like that's something we can do to <br /> create a few districts where candidates without significant access to wealth can get <br /> elected. <br /> Krishna Mondal—Yes,this would be acceptable. <br /> Jonathan Weiler—Yes <br />