Browse
Search
Minutes 06-01-2021 Virtual Business meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Minutes 06-01-2021 Virtual Business meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2021 11:19:28 AM
Creation date
9/8/2021 11:12:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/1/2021
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-01-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br /> Margo Lakin said Attachment 2 did not include her questions that she sent in to the <br /> Planning Department, and wonders if the questions of others were left out. She asked if the <br /> Commissioner for the Environment will be invited to weigh in with scientific information. She <br /> expressed great concern about fully understanding environmental impacts including flora, <br /> fauna, hydrology reports, an alternative water source for Hillsborough, etc. She said she lived <br /> through the Flint water crisis, and it is imperative to answer these questions before <br /> development. <br /> Del Ward said Orange County is full of smart people and is continuing to grow. He said <br /> area B seems like a great place for a new elementary school, not something the size of <br /> Medline. He said area A sits within EDD, but Area B does not. He said there has been a loss <br /> of faith in the community. He said at the May 17th meeting, someone asked if people in area A <br /> would be displaced, and the Planning Department director responded that he had dinner with <br /> someone 21 years ago. He said that is not thoughtful community engagement, and public <br /> meetings must continue. He said he is confused as to whether this is a plan or a study, and <br /> this all seems a bit much. <br /> Commissioner Hamilton said the name change was discussed at a previous meeting. <br /> She said a plan is something that County commissioners agree on after there has been input <br /> from the community and environmental agencies. She said she wants to know when the Board <br /> will create a plan, and which areas will be targeted. She said the BOCC is in a process where <br /> things are not being taken off the table. She said the BOCC needs to communicate what it <br /> wants to Mebane. She said she would like more community input prior to determining a plan, <br /> as well as a clear understanding of the costs and benefits for developing this area. <br /> Commissioner Hamilton said the County should communicate to Mebane that it is going <br /> to work on a timeline to make a clear plan on how the County wants to move forward. She said <br /> it is important for this to be clear, so that the BOCC is not constantly picking at this, <br /> understanding that things can always change. <br /> Commissioner Greene said she understands how staff got to Areas B, C, and D, but she <br /> cannot support changing anything for Area B. She said it would be better to stick with the <br /> original EDD north of West Ten Road. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said whatever the plan looks like, at some point there is going to <br /> be commercial development near to residential development. He said it would be helpful to talk <br /> to Mebane about its goals for corporate development. He said he would push back against free <br /> for all annexation. He said looking at the map, there are two large areas already annexed by <br /> the City of Mebane, which are mostly north of area B. He said Mebane has already said it does <br /> not want to go to C. He asked if the BOCC should encourage economic development from <br /> areas to the east of the City, and similarly those other areas east of A are in consideration. He <br /> said it would be helpful to determine areas where economic development should be <br /> concentrated. He said areas on the map that are already purple would not require changes to <br /> the County's land use map, and it may make more sense to have some contiguity in an <br /> economic development area. He said there should be renewed focus on the existing EDD <br /> areas, and if there are already services in the annexed areas, it makes sense to begin there. <br /> He said there ought to be some reasonable expectation where economic development should <br /> be concentrated. <br /> Commissioner Bedford agreed with focusing on parcel A, including water and sewer <br /> installation, and the area with the flea market. She said there might be a possibility for a school <br /> site in Area B, but it will depend on growth and other potential sites. She referred to Area B, <br /> and said she would prefer to keep the rural buffer and keep the agreement. She said Mebane <br /> was invited to participate in the WASMPBA, and declined. She said she would like to continue <br /> exploring this area with the community, as there might an opportunity to do mixed use with a <br /> hotel and shops, businesses, restaurants, and residential. She said Mebane did listen when <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.