Agenda - 11-26-2001-c1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

dos Zonino ORcer's Malvals 1. The EC-5 zoning tllstdtl is not wnsistem with the Comprehensive Plan, wM1ich is typical of all EC-5 tllsNtls because Ney are not bcabtl in a non-resideMlal notle of Ne Comprehensive Plan -- 2. The EC-5 tlisVicl was inlentletl b be eppllatl to propetllea located outside of aCSvity nodes Mat hatl operable, commercial uses at Ne]ime of implemema0on of zoning In IM1e various fOwnships 3. TM1IS EGS tlistdct was applletl wM1en inning case atloptetl in CM1eeks TorvnsM1ip in 1984. 6. A service station was In operetlon on the property at Ne time inning went into eRect Although the station diswntinuatl its use tluring I-65 widening, the EC-5 spedfic use remains valid. 5. TM1e shell M the gas staGOn [documenting a historical comrretdel uaej still la on the propeM1y. fi. Atltlitionally, the petltloned propeM la DprEere0 on Ne noNh and souN by NCDOT right-of- way which provitles a separation irom atljacent propetlias. The existing EG5 Olstdcl is to Ne west. Z Thia request to reestlbllsM1 Ne EC-5 tllstritl is not inconsistent with the CpmpreM1ensive Plan because EC-5 uses were wmmercial uaesnot locatstl wiNln tleslgnaletl Activity Notles on Ne Cpmprehenalve Plan. 8. Allowing s reeslablisM1menl of the originally-sizetl EC-5 district is reasonable given Ne pas[ use and the relative ease M esaeasibility to the ails by the motoring public. 9. TM1e applicant's request m Increase Ne size of IM1e orginal zoning disNd by 10%, wh'¢h Is allowetl in Article 4.2.12 of Ne Zoning OMinance should not be approved in slaFS view because Ne site is lopted in a Critical Watershed Ovetlay OlsMct. 10, The upgratle of Ne abantloned site end placement of a new build'mg wiN current cotle elantlams would bean Improvement antl Droperty value enhancelnan[. Development Process. ScM1etlule antl Action • Public Haedng an November 26, 2001 • Refer rezoning petlgon to the Planning Bwm for a rewmmendatlon, to be retumetl to Ne BoaN of County Canmissioners no sconer Nan Febmary 19, 2002. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no tlired public financial impaIX with this dec'slan item. RECOMMENOATION(3): Zpninp O(RCer Rewmmentlallpn; Approval of Zoning Atlas Amendment pursuant to Setlion 4.2.12 of Ne Zoning Ordinance to allow Ne size of IM1e original disViq, wfiich would involve e remning of 1.09 acres hom AR (U-Eno-CA) to EC-5 (LLEno-CA). Shoultl IM1e BOCC approve this general use petition the following requirements sM1all apply tluring Ne Builtling Permit Process'. g) Alllmperviouswa[ershatl limilafioresM1all be met. M1) Atwenty-(20)feetwHth landscaped buRer shall be eateblishetl abng the new right-ot-way. Oeaign uitsda shall meet wmmeroial standaNS. I) Ewwmlc Oevelppment Dlsbitl standards shall be vaeq where aPPlicebla.