Orange County NC Website
79 <br /> Should you have public hearings? <br /> The answer to this question will depend <br /> on local circumstances. Cities,counties, <br /> and school systems are all free to adopt <br /> additional procedures if they wish.They <br /> might, for example, appoint a citizen <br /> advisory board to study the redistricting <br /> question and propose new boundaries. <br /> The danger, of course, is that the advi- <br /> sory board will come up with a plan that _ <br /> the governing board does not like, and <br /> the result is a political problem.The board <br /> might conduct public hearings or in some <br /> other way establish procedures for pub- <br /> lic comment. - - <br /> There is no requirement that the <br /> board obtain public input,but doing so <br /> may be a very good idea for two reasons.. <br /> First, it demonstrates that the board is _ <br /> responsive to the people on an issue �! <br /> as fundamental as the election of their <br /> representatives. Second, a hearing (or <br /> another input mechanism)may be help- <br /> ful in achieving preclearance of the redis- <br /> tricting plan for cities, counties, and <br /> school systems subject to the require- <br /> ments of Section 5 of the Voting Rights <br /> Act of 1965,discussed later. <br /> A public hearing,if held,will likely be <br /> most effective if a couple of alternative <br /> plans are available for discussion.They <br /> will help focus the comments and pro- <br /> vide a meaningful context. Citizens at- <br /> tending should be permitted to present two great advantages. First, if they are mittee too must be open.Work by staff <br /> their own plans. carefully chosen, they bring expertise. on the project is not subject to the sta- <br /> They should have skills in assessing the tute,however. <br /> Should you hire outside consultants? census data that exceed the skills likely <br /> There are valid reasons to consider hir- to be found on the board or the staff. Can you keep drafts of tentative <br /> ing outside consultants and valid reasons Also,they should be thoroughly familiar plans secret? <br /> not to do so.In some instances,of course, with the legal considerations involved in Not completely,no.The North Carolina <br /> redistricting will not be necessary at the one-person/one-vote principle, dis- Supreme Court has interpreted the state's <br /> all—where population change has not cussed earlier, and in the tricky notions public records law,27 which gives citizens <br /> been great and the 10 percent rule is not of racial fairness and equal protection, the right to see and copy most documents <br /> violated. In some other instances, even discussed later. Second,consultants can made or received in the course of the gov- <br /> where the imbalance does exceed 10 per- lend the process a sense of fairness—they ernment's business, to include prelimi- <br /> cent, it will be possible with relatively are outsiders brought in, not insiders nary drafts of documents.28 At what <br /> straightforward effort to bring the dis- protecting themselves—and they can be point a working document becomes a <br /> tricts into compliance.The duty to come blamed if things go wrong. preliminary draft subject to the require- <br /> up with a proposal can be delegated to ments of public inspection is a matter not <br /> the manager or to the city's or county's Can you consider redistricting in fully settled in the law.29 The safe proce- <br /> planning staff,for instance,to work in closed sessions? dure is to assume that once a redistricting <br /> conjunction with the unit's attorney. No.The open meetings law requires that map is recognizable as such,it is proba- <br /> There is a political bomb waiting to ex- meetings of public bodies be open to the bly a public record. <br /> plode,however,if the redrawing necessi- public,except for particular subjects set <br /> tates pitting incumbents against one out in the statute.26 Redistricting is not May you protect incumbents? <br /> another, and the manager or the staff an exception.If the board sets up a com- Yes.The U.S. Supreme Court has recog- <br /> may not wish to be involved. mittee of board members to work on nized "incumbency protection, at least <br /> Consultants,on the other hand,bring redistricting,the meetings of that com- in the limited form of avoiding contests <br /> 8 POPULAR GOVERNMENT SPRING 2-00I <br />