Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-02-2021; 12-8 - Information Item - Memorandum - Transmittal of the Final Report from the BOCC Elections Advisory Group (BEAG) on the Process for Electing County Commissioners in Orange County
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Agenda - 09-02-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-02-2021; 12-8 - Information Item - Memorandum - Transmittal of the Final Report from the BOCC Elections Advisory Group (BEAG) on the Process for Electing County Commissioners in Orange County
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2021 2:41:58 PM
Creation date
8/26/2021 2:46:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2021
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
12-8
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-02-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
60 <br /> 4 <br /> Mr. Wilder commented that on Page 9, in the middle of the page, there was a reference <br /> to Appendices L and M. He wondered if the reference to Appendices L and M was <br /> applicable at this particular location in the Report since Appendices L and M were Todd <br /> McGee's Powerpoint presentation on the SurveyMonkey results, and the printout of the <br /> actual survey results from the SurveyMonkey. The paragraph immediately proceeding <br /> the Appendices reference did not address Mr. McGee's presentation or the <br /> SurveyMonkey results. <br /> Mr. Wilder added that he did not see a specific reference to "Appendix K" (the grid) in the <br /> Report and wondered if incorporating a reference at the appropriate location was needed. <br /> Mr. Wilder also added that he did not see a reference to "Appendix N" (which was part of <br /> the SurveyMonkey results) in the Report and wondered if incorporating a reference at the <br /> appropriate location was needed. <br /> As a potential solution to the items above regarding Appendices K, L, M, and N, Mr. Wilder <br /> suggested that the Appendices L and M reference be deleted on page 9. Concurrently, <br /> he suggested that on page 6 under June 24t", the potential addition of "(See Appendices <br /> K, L, M & N)" at the end of the first paragraph after the word "recommendations." That <br /> paragraph referenced both the grid and the survey results, which constituted the content <br /> of Appendices K, L, M and N. <br /> Group Member Jenkins had previously followed up that Mr. Wilder was correct and that <br /> his proposed update was probably the best way to handle these items. Group members <br /> concurred with Mr. Wilder and Group Member Jenkins. <br /> Moving to two final clarifications, Mr. Wilder noted that the July 22, 2021 Meeting <br /> summary currently provided in Appendix C was marked as "DRAFT". Based on the Group <br /> approving the Meeting Summary earlier in this meeting, staff would update the document <br /> appropriately and replace the current "Draft" in the Report with an "Approved" version in <br /> the final Report. <br /> Lastly, Mr. Wilder shared that the August 5, 2021 Meeting summary in Appendix C was <br /> currently noted as "DRAFT" since it was just a placeholder. Staff planned to compile a <br /> document after tonight's meeting to replace this placeholder and it would be marked as <br /> "Not Approved Due to No Additional Group Meetings" at the top of the first page. Group <br /> Member Jenkins commented that it might be helpful to also add wording to the effect <br /> "Compiled by Staff." <br /> 5. Approval of Specific Revisions to the Draft Report <br /> With no other suggestions or discussion on proposed changes or revisions, Judge Bryan <br /> moved the Group forward to considering approval of the updates and revisions that had <br /> been discussed. He deferred to Group Co-Chair Hazirjian for the potential consideration <br /> of any motions. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian opened the floor for any motions on the updates and revisions <br /> that had been previously discussed. Group Member Jenkins motioned to approve all of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.