Orange County NC Website
55 <br /> 4 <br /> materials had impacted the Group's efforts and discussion and suggested the materials <br /> not be included in the Appendices. <br /> Group Member Sykes inquired regarding the plan and schedule for presenting the Report <br /> to the Board of Commissioners, specifically in light of other items the Board might be <br /> discussing at its meetings. Mr. Wilder responded that, from his limited perspective, he <br /> expected that the presentation would occur at either the Board of Commissioners' <br /> September 2, 2021 Business meeting or at its September 9, 2021 work session. <br /> Mr. Wilder noted that the September 2 meeting would likely have a full agenda based on <br /> the Board's summer break, along with the current plan for the Board to also consider <br /> appointing an individual to fill the vacant Commissioner seat due to Commissioner Mark <br /> Dorosin's resignation effective July 31, 2021. He noted that presentation at the <br /> September 2 meeting would allow for public comment on the Report item, and that public <br /> comment could potentially be extensive. <br /> Mr. Wilder further shared that the September 9 work session already had proposed items <br /> for discussion, but that the Report may also be considered as a topic for that meeting. <br /> He noted that the Board of Commissioners by practice did not receive public comments <br /> at work sessions, so the public would not have the opportunity to provide comments at <br /> that meeting. However, Mr. Wilder expressed confidence that the Board of <br /> Commissioners would welcome significant public comment on this entire topic as <br /> discussions proceeded in the future. <br /> After some additional discussion, it was agreed to not include the 110 pages in the <br /> Appendices, and a reference to the materials would be included under Appendix F. <br /> After Group discussion, Group members generally expressed a preference that the Board <br /> receive a presentation and discuss the Report at the September 9 work session rather <br /> than the September 2 Business meeting since the Business meeting would potentially <br /> have a substantial number of other matters on the agenda, and the Co-Chairs would <br /> address that interest. The September 9 work session would also allow the newly- <br /> appointed Commissioner to be seated and additional time to prepare for the Report <br /> discussion. <br /> 6. Discussion on Final Approval of the Report <br /> This item is addressed in discussion below. <br /> 7. Potential Need for Any Additional Follow-up or Meeting Based on Report <br /> Status/Revisions <br /> Judge Bryan and Group Co-Chair Hazirjian directed discussion to the potential approval <br /> of the report and the process the Group wanted to pursue based on the revisions. Mr. <br /> Wilder noted that the full Group could potentially reconvene for another meeting to review <br /> the revisions and provide final Report approval. Alternatively, the Group could approve <br />