Orange County NC Website
54 <br /> 3 <br /> and the at-large election method. Group Member Jonathan Weiler voiced his agreement <br /> with Group Member Catterall's comments. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian shared that she had been reviewing both Report documents <br /> and that potentially the Group consider using the Jenkins document as the principal <br /> document and incorporate the substance of Recommendations/Suggestions section from <br /> the Bryan document into the Jenkins document under the first bullet point. <br /> 5. Approval of Specific Revisions to the Draft Report <br /> Group Member Arab suggested that the Group consider, as detailed by Group Co-Chair <br /> Hazirjian, incorporating the language from the Bryan document ("Response" section on <br /> page 8) into the Jenkins document (on page 6 under the first bullet point). Group Member <br /> Arab further commented, as Group Member Catterall had suggested, that the Group <br /> consider incorporating the at-large, last two paragraphs language from page 10 of the <br /> Bryan document into page 6 of the Jenkins document under the second bullet point. <br /> Group Member Arab followed up and suggested that the Group consider incorporating <br /> the one paragraph single member district language from page 9 of the Bryan document <br /> into the Jenkins document on page 6 under the third bullet point. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian asked if any Group members would like to make a motion based <br /> on the suggestions. Group Member Sykes motioned for the Group to proceed with the <br /> Jenkins document and incorporate the "Response" language, the at-large language, and <br /> the single member language from the Bryan document into the Jenkins document as <br /> discussed. Group Member Bremer seconded the motion. Group Co-Chair Hazirjian <br /> asked Mr. Wilder to call the names of Group members for voting purposes. Group <br /> members voted by roll call on the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian and Judge Bryan asked if there were any other potential <br /> revisions to consider for the Report document. After a brief discussion on information <br /> County Attorney John Roberts had provided regarding multi-member districts, it was <br /> determined there were not any additional proposals from Group members. Mr. Wilder <br /> requested some direction from the Group regarding the Appendices. He noted that the <br /> current proposed Appendices totaled 295 pages and shared examples of the content and <br /> number of pages for each. <br /> He shared that there were no materials to include for the proposed Appendix J, thereby <br /> meaning that it needed to be deleted and the subsequent appendices re-lettered <br /> appropriately. <br /> Mr. Wilder then asked if the Group wanted to consider eliminating one potential portion <br /> of Appendix F that consisted of 110 pages detailing voting results for Orange County <br /> Commissioner elections from 2000 through 2020. The 110 pages had been emailed to <br /> Group members as information, and were not specifically discussed at any meetings. He <br /> also noted that the documents were public information readily available through the Board <br /> of Elections. Group Member Arab commented that she did not think the voting results <br />