Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-02-2021; 12-8 - Information Item - Memorandum - Transmittal of the Final Report from the BOCC Elections Advisory Group (BEAG) on the Process for Electing County Commissioners in Orange County
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2021
>
Agenda - 09-02-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-02-2021; 12-8 - Information Item - Memorandum - Transmittal of the Final Report from the BOCC Elections Advisory Group (BEAG) on the Process for Electing County Commissioners in Orange County
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2021 2:41:58 PM
Creation date
8/26/2021 2:46:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2021
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
12-8
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-02-2021 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
54 <br /> 3 <br /> and the at-large election method. Group Member Jonathan Weiler voiced his agreement <br /> with Group Member Catterall's comments. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian shared that she had been reviewing both Report documents <br /> and that potentially the Group consider using the Jenkins document as the principal <br /> document and incorporate the substance of Recommendations/Suggestions section from <br /> the Bryan document into the Jenkins document under the first bullet point. <br /> 5. Approval of Specific Revisions to the Draft Report <br /> Group Member Arab suggested that the Group consider, as detailed by Group Co-Chair <br /> Hazirjian, incorporating the language from the Bryan document ("Response" section on <br /> page 8) into the Jenkins document (on page 6 under the first bullet point). Group Member <br /> Arab further commented, as Group Member Catterall had suggested, that the Group <br /> consider incorporating the at-large, last two paragraphs language from page 10 of the <br /> Bryan document into page 6 of the Jenkins document under the second bullet point. <br /> Group Member Arab followed up and suggested that the Group consider incorporating <br /> the one paragraph single member district language from page 9 of the Bryan document <br /> into the Jenkins document on page 6 under the third bullet point. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian asked if any Group members would like to make a motion based <br /> on the suggestions. Group Member Sykes motioned for the Group to proceed with the <br /> Jenkins document and incorporate the "Response" language, the at-large language, and <br /> the single member language from the Bryan document into the Jenkins document as <br /> discussed. Group Member Bremer seconded the motion. Group Co-Chair Hazirjian <br /> asked Mr. Wilder to call the names of Group members for voting purposes. Group <br /> members voted by roll call on the motion, and the motion was approved unanimously. <br /> Group Co-Chair Hazirjian and Judge Bryan asked if there were any other potential <br /> revisions to consider for the Report document. After a brief discussion on information <br /> County Attorney John Roberts had provided regarding multi-member districts, it was <br /> determined there were not any additional proposals from Group members. Mr. Wilder <br /> requested some direction from the Group regarding the Appendices. He noted that the <br /> current proposed Appendices totaled 295 pages and shared examples of the content and <br /> number of pages for each. <br /> He shared that there were no materials to include for the proposed Appendix J, thereby <br /> meaning that it needed to be deleted and the subsequent appendices re-lettered <br /> appropriately. <br /> Mr. Wilder then asked if the Group wanted to consider eliminating one potential portion <br /> of Appendix F that consisted of 110 pages detailing voting results for Orange County <br /> Commissioner elections from 2000 through 2020. The 110 pages had been emailed to <br /> Group members as information, and were not specifically discussed at any meetings. He <br /> also noted that the documents were public information readily available through the Board <br /> of Elections. Group Member Arab commented that she did not think the voting results <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.