Agenda - 11-19-2001-9d - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Chapel HIII requesletl that: • The map be revisetl tc inclutle the urban eervicas boundary Illustratetl on the Lentl Use Plan adopted by the Town Council on May 8, 200D. Chapel HMI's amendment tdthe a9reemen[ was a result of a land use boundary map change the[ includetl the Urban Services Boundary retraction on [heir atlopted Mey 2000 comprehensive plan. There are other implications of [he urban service line change since land use tlensides that now lie outsltle the line will not be supportetl by infmslmcture. Howeveq at this time antl pertaining tc this agreement the Urban Services Boundary change is reasonable. SUMMARY COMMENT Two aspects of the process to atlopt antl implement the agreement ahoultl ba natetl. Atlopting a muki-party agreement is a challenging Prospect not only from the consensus building creation stage but during [he final intlivitlusl en[ky adoption phase. Any change that is suggested by one entity needs to be retllatdbutetl antl reatloptetl by the other entkiee In a'rountl robin' process. All final comments are [hereby Inooryora[etl antl a consistent agreement antl map le adopted by ell parties. A second aspect inclutles how the muttFperry agreement becomes a lantl use planning antl regulatory tlocument. A proposal has been posetl [hat would auggasl that the agreement be Incoryoretetl into Me joint planning agreement with Chapel HIII antl Canbom. This could be brought forwaN in the Apri12002 regulatly scheduletl JPA Public Heafng. Otherjudstlictione that are part' to the agreement, ouch as Hillsborough, but ere not part of the Chapel HiIVCanborol Orenge County JPA woultl need to be implemented through land use cooperation in another manner. Although not party to the agreement at Chia time, the ckies of Mebane antl Durham who provitle utilkles in Orange County may similarly be involvetl in cooNinatetl land use planning. In any event, both concluding aspects of the agreement will inevitably leatl M progressive and comprehensive public service and land use planning. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None at this time. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Administration rewmmentls Mat the BCaN atlopt Me Waterantl Sewer Management, Planning antl Boundary Agreement wkh the modlficationa noted above.