Browse
Search
2020-370-E-BOCC-Mauldin and Jenkins audit contract renewal
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2020's
>
2020
>
2020-370-E-BOCC-Mauldin and Jenkins audit contract renewal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2021 12:34:46 PM
Creation date
8/25/2021 12:33:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Report on the Firm’s System of Quality Control <br /> <br />To the Shareholders of Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC <br />and the National Peer Review Committee: <br /> <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of <br />Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC (the firm), applicable to engagements not subject to PCAOB permanent <br />inspection, in effect for the year ended May 31, 2017. Our peer review was conducted in <br />accordance with the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews established by the <br />Peer Review Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (Standards). <br />A summary of the nature, objectives, scope, limitations of, and the procedures performed in a <br />System Review as described in the Standards may be found at www.aicpa.org/prsummary. The <br />summary also includes an explanation of how engagements identified as not performed or <br />reported in conformity with applicable professional standards, if any, are evaluated by a peer <br />reviewer to determine a peer review rating. <br /> <br />Firm’s Responsibility <br />The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with it to <br />provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with <br />applicable professional standards in all material respects. The firm is also responsible for <br />evaluating actions to promptly remediate engagements deemed as not performed or reported in <br />conformity with professional standards, when appropriate, and for remediating weaknesses in its <br />system of quality control, if any. <br /> <br />Peer Reviewer’s Responsibility <br /> <br />Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the <br />firm’s compliance therewith based on our review. <br /> <br />Required Selections and Considerations <br /> <br />Engagements selected for review included engagements performed under Government Auditing <br />Standards, including compliance audits under the Single Audit Act; audits of employee benefit <br />plans, an audit performed under FDICIA, and examinations of service organization’s SOC 1 and <br />SOC 2 engagements. <br /> <br />As part of our peer review, we considered reviews by regulatory entities as communicated by the <br />firm, if applicable, in determining the nature and extent of our procedures. <br /> <br />DocuSign Envelope ID: D2809161-AA0B-4AFA-8A26-418CF7221077
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.