Orange County NC Website
Appmach& Initiative <br /> Cyween xx I_04ptr prapo5es c1liginR SIm dWW dlYlde with a$1.2 bllkm Stag!Ir1Yt3tn*ttt,u%ft flJndd{rolls the T <br /> ALmerlcan Remtw Plan,in thefWlowing areas to achi"e digital equity in North Carolina,We will also kVerME! <br /> *mlfl{altt private swcw 1rt monwnl. <br /> Infrsstrurturr l F+•sue MllaL*41Y�I+KemlSiarlt*aSapredb C��lktss l8�'30 MLip•4 k+ <br /> rrrya rhan 96%4�Nyi�h r,"M-hawghgkPL <br /> C*rAMiS+rt 9*O q <br /> {� 3topGap:alutxns <br /> A+rvrdablMW LSral+'AW harfttS rW Nwh C**Iwar4 <br /> UIRLILiteracy IMWC-wP-W#r41FV4*ft4 FN9frh Gr4lMLa 1Of"LP*" p 4t4 hO.1PRti <br /> sn rg d[aAkrnl *� Intrmetlhnx4rhdWWIteracyandYp.Wngmnmi;atwcrmwgtreulrWreommy. <br /> • DO*&SL anb anaLFlttNMM <br /> anw"M Prl Ow Lmrwv <br /> Mrtirrisieai+vc lwppkmrffts'gstlPS StaW 6d•wrsVa4x[ap&"is wppori hMh-Mx cl vrtrmri rMons. ' <br /> American Rescue Act Funds ($1.2 trillion; $350billion for state and local recovery funds; local recovery <br /> funds$28million received directly from Fed ($14million tranche already taken); state funds—Treasury <br /> Dept, relevant interim final guidelines; stopgap funds for vendors that can't hit 100/20; state recovery <br /> piece $420million for affordability; $330 million for digital literacy; std aiming for is minimum 100/20— <br /> aim for being able to measure results, all students having 100/20 by 2024. Have access to local recovery <br /> funds to use at our discretion (treasury interim final guidelines—includes definitions of <br /> underserved/unserved); Doug—question Emergency Connectivity Fund (through FCC) (up to <br /> $250/device-separate from ARA) $7.2billion for whole country; Emergency Broadband Fund $3.2billion <br /> reimburse provider up to$50/household;Terri—q for Doug=> have a map of these students/staff?; <br /> 1460 student hotspots/170 staff where students didn't have good broadband access (all across area— <br /> White Cross and other areas across the district); Doug has addresses for these students/staff; asking for <br /> data and using it to justify need; in Treasury interim final guidelines, want funds used for <br /> underserved/unserved; networks where there is not "reliable" access to 25/3?? Homes that do not have <br /> access to reliable wired—systems have to be built to 100/100 symmetrical unless not possible then have <br /> to be built to 100/20 scalable;Terri—must provide metrics, serving unserved/underserved; governor's <br /> goal is to serve 100%of all students; bottom line—local recovery funds OC can control <br /> RFP Review <br /> Jim—had quite a few comments;Terri—concerns; happy w/idea of making this a public/private <br /> partnership—county would own resources and someone would operate the resources in our name; <br /> include what costs to deploy/manage/maintain; ownership left intentionally vague in order to get <br /> interest on RFP—see what responses we'd get then go into contract phase; SG: language indeterminate <br /> but that's okay for now; EM: agree, no issue with County owning the infrastructure and leasing to <br /> vendor for modest fee (one that will be attractive to providers); if have questions once we get <br /> responses, can get more info from respondents;Jim—this RFP is looking for a turnkey solution and we <br /> can stipulate that we want ownership during contract phase—current RFP for provider to <br /> build/deploy/maintain internet service to 5000 homes—not for county to build fiber network;Terri's <br /> point—if we go with RFP as-is, we run the risk of getting responses then pulling out because they want <br /> to own the fiber themselves; Todd—can negotiate after responses received; Catharine—short term is 18 <br /> months; room in RFP for multiple service providers; Catharine—proposes just talking with providers <br /> rather than dusting off RFP for short term solution;Jeff—done this in dozens of counties,way we <br />